“Gas Prices Up This Long Weekend? Oh, it’s the Eclipse”



$1.37 per litre for gas this long weekend. Oil company apologists have absolutely abrogated any responsibility for this, outright gouging of Vancouver drivers.

The price of gas has plummeted from $100.00 plus in 2010 to a little more than $45.000 in 2017.

Gas prices in Vancouver at the peak of oil prices (when oil was $110.00 per barrel) was $1.50 per litre. The price of oil has dropped more than 50%, while the price of gas at the pump has dropped 13%.

Now that oil prices are down more than 50% of 2010 levels, one would think gas at the pump would be about $.75 per litre or so.

But clearly, we don’t understand the sophisticated pressures on oil companies.

I see a hurriedly called brainstorming session of gas suppliers to come up with more creative excuses for their long weekend cash grab.

  • We’ve used the Cherry Point refinery’s having a particularly difficult maintenance period – can’t use that old chestnut.
  • We’ve blamed unrest in Venezuela – a couple of rebels feeling a bit lathered. But we kind of like these latest rebels ( they are against a left wing government), and that was a weak excuse anyway.
  • We’ve carefully explained that Vancouver’s oil comes predominantly from the U.S. ,so the demand is greater, except in Abbotsford and Silverdale who can quite easily sell gas at 15 cents cheaper to compete with their local American gas competition. No one believes that one anymore.
  • We’ve explained ad nauseum about the added gas tax we pay ( damn guvmn’t) but that’s dangerous because if anyone actually looks at the gas tax paid they would see that Vancouverites pay 11 cents more than other BC jurisdictions, while our gas prices are 30 or 40 cents higher, and even more on long weekends. They might also notice that gas taxes aren’t moving up on long weekends. We’d better gloss over that excuse.
  • We’ve tried patiently explaining that sometimes we buy too much inventory at a higher price and so prices can’t go down until that inventory is use up. Unfortunately, we never buy too much when the price is lower so any excuse for an increase is immediately reflected in the price at the pump- so , people are becoming wary of that line.
  • We’ve used the lower Canadian dollar excuse haven’t we? But that doesn’t explain why it’s just Vancouver we choose to punish each long weekend.

“ Come on people, think outside the box…”

We need a new excuse – a beauty, one we haven’t trotted out before, one that will explain why perennially low oil prices are never reflected in Vancouver prices and why we jack up prices at the pump every long weekend as high as we can crank them.

“I know”, says a small, ambitious voice in the background.
” We can say that the upcoming eclipse is causing an increased demand for gas, and that’s why the price went up ten cents on this particular long weekend!”

“Surely they’re not that stupid, are they?”

Well, if they swallowed the Cherry Point Maintenance excuse, they’ll believe anything”

“OK. Brilliant” says the brainstorming circle.

“Right, Sally, you work up some nonsense on the eclipse – once in a lifetime , people will be driving everywhere, demand up, yada yada. Throw in a mention of high taxes and we’ll get someone who is an “industry expert” to trot it out ASAP. And we’ll get that reporter, what’s her name again? She’ll make it sound objective.

“Don’t forget everybody, the excuse this time is :“

“Eclipse causing high demand, high gas taxes because of Mayor Moonbeam, and it’s too complicated to expect prices at the pump to match the international price of a barrel of oil “ (that is, unless the price of oil goes up, in which case there’s an absolute relationship between oil prices and prices at the pump)”

“OK. Get out there and crank up those gas prices – we’ve only got another 10 years or so to gouge the bastards – oh and remember, we’re not colluding”



Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Four Reasons Why Losing the Courtenay/Comox Recount Might Help the N.D.P.


If the BC(neo)Libs overturn the result in Courtenay /Comox, the parliament seat count would be 44- 40- 3.

That looks like a majority, but another election would soon result, as the BC(neo)Libs have few policies even close to palatable to the Greens or the NDP and their vote lead would be so scant. But regardless of the outcome of the recount there will be another election soon.

Although the recount result might have little legislative significance, it could have considerable political significance that could ultimately help the N.D.P.


1) It may keep Christy Clark as B.C.(neo)Lib Leader
Looking past Christy Clark is not something the B.C. voter is used to, but it’s not difficult to see the vultures gathering.

Kevin Falcon and perhaps even James Moore are circling the carrion of her BC(neo)Lib leadership. Either of them could resurrect BC(neo)Libs ,with Ms.Clark’s myriad controversies and missteps purged by her downfall.

If Ms. Clark can claim “A majority government”, she can hang on to the Premiership and party leadership for the brief period it will take for the government to collapse. If she leads the government into the next election, the electoral message may likely be “perhaps you didn’t hear us on May 9th
2) It would make the Greens position even more stark.

Were the seat count 44- 40 -3, once a speaker was appointed, the voting MLA count would effectively be 43-40-3 – a deadlock should the Greens vote with the N.D.P. True, the speaker can vote in a “tie” situation, but repeated tie breaking votes would soon rob the speaker of any appearance of parliamentary objectivity.
With a virtual tie in the house, the government could pass any legislation not voted against by all three Green MLAs. making Greens appear responsible for the passage of any regressive legislation, even if it’s a trade off situation.

While N.D.P. opposition is expected, the Greens would only have the power to allow passage of bills or force a tie breaking vote, a weaker and more stark position than the balance of power situation they are currently in.

3)It would likely strengthen John Horgan’s Leadership

Were a minority B.C.(neo)Lib government to limp along, John Horgan would get media coverage that he didn’t get during the election. The more people see of John Horgan the more they like him. A Christy Clark “majority” government would give him more media exposure and more opportunity to explain his party’s platform.

The N.D.P. would be expected to oppose the BC(neo)Lib legislation and would not be blamed for their imminent downfall – the three Greens would wear that,as the party that could prop up the government but didn’t.
Mr.Horgan would be able to both court and criticize the Green Party for dithering or vacillating on marginally acceptable legislation.


4) It would likely reinforce the anger of the B.C. electorate towards Christy Clark.

The overwhelming message of the May 9th election was “we’ve had it with Christy Clark, her dishonesty, her scandals, and her pay for play government.”

If she can limp along with a “majority” government, an angry electorate will speak even more loudly in the next election, likely identifying the N.D.P as the real opposition to smiling Christy ,especially given that Weaver has been courting the B.C.(neo)Libs so openly of late.




Of course this is all speculation. We’ll have to wait to see what happens in the imminent recounts. Yes, yes, it will “be interesting”.

But one thing is sure. For the N.D.P, facing a B.C. (neo) Lib. Party led by Christy Clark is politically and strategically a better option  than having a minority government fall in weeks and facing a B.C.(neo)Lib party purged of all sins by dumping Christy Clark for the people’s saviour, Kevin Falcon or James Moore.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Looks As If Greens are Feeling Premier Clark’s Love

It appears as if  Andrew Weaver’s Greens will likely go for BC(neo)Libs.They’ll not likely “join” them, just agree to a couple of policy changes in return for supporting Premier Clark’s revised “Green” budget.
Greens seem more angry with the NDP for suggesting that the splitting of May 9th’s  election vote would hand the election to the B.C.(neo)Libs than they are with the sixteen years of odious government rejected by 60% of British Columbian voters.

Andrew Weaver has bit of a Napoleonic streak , and would love to be a Cabinet Minister with an extension of the media love and policy clout he’s currently enjoying.

There are lots of advantages to this agreement/arrangement between Greens and BC(neo)Libs.

Premier Clark knows that without Green support, Kevin Falcon or James Moore will have her job quicker’n you can say “Leadership review.” She has to get Greens on side or she’s done, as Premier and party leader.

She’ll sell the farm to hold onto power – she’s in a very weak bargaining position.

And what do the Greens want from her.?

Party Status? I’m sure Premier Clark has “already giffen ze order…” This can’t even count as a demand.

Big money out of politics? That’s easy if you have a huge war chest left over and corporations and unions can easily turn big corporate donations and much smaller union donations into myriad “personal ” donations – no biggy.

Proportional representation? Gee, that assures a three party system in B.C.,  with two progressive party’s splitting the “hell no , not Christy” vote. Done deal.

Kinder Morgan? Environmentalists will likely stop Kinder Morgan anyway -if she can just stall a bit, this could be done.

Premier Clark can get the Green’s “big three” demands in the bag without any financial budget effect and with little fuss.

So Mr. Weaver can easily extort his big three;  big money out of politics ,a promise of a “re- look” at pipelines,and a referendum on proportional representation. Premier Clark gets  off cheaply –  the deal is done.

But more important,and the real motivator for Mr Weaver’s BC(neo)Lib sellout, will be the fawning street cred he’ll get as a “negotiator.” Just think…

” Mr. Weaver got more out of Premier Clark than the NDP could in 20 years – all because he’s reasonable and not combative and ill tempered like the NDP’s John Horgan.

“Weaver Catches More Political Flies with Honey…”

The script reads beautifully – the media will report on it daily for months and the “Weaver’s a brilliant negotiator” narrative will join, perhaps even supplant , “fast ferries” and “the 90’s” as the go to anti NDP mantra in B.C’s right wing election lexicon.

Both BC(neo)Libs and Greens will be able to point to what’s possible if one collaborates on issues rather than just saying no all the time, like the NDP does.

If ( when) this happens, Weaver will have cynically chosen personal and party ambition over his progressive agenda,not one plank of which matches the BC(neo)Lib agenda, the first plank of which is to “control spending.”

But we likely won’t notice this and it won’t be reported on.

What remains to be seen is whether the sixty percent BC(neo)Lib  rejectors, in BC will buy this  Macbeth -like move by Mr. Weaver or choke on the photographs of Premier Clark welcoming him into the fold.

Personally ,I’m preparing a friend to perform the Heimlich maneuver on me when I see the smiling pair of them shaking  hands collaboratively..

* Author’s note.
My apologies for the use of the term “BC(neo)Lib. I can’t bring myself to call our provincial government party “Liberal”, as I feel they would have to lurch to the political left to even  be considered “conservative”.

I used “Socred” for a while but many, quite correctly, pointed out that there are no longer Socreds out there and that I shouldn’t tempt fate by ever mentioning the organization again. Hence, I settled on B.C.(neo)Lib. as a more accurate description of the party.

Should you be so inclined, I urge you to use the term too –  liberally. 
Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

So, in the U.S., Who’s Left to Call B.S.?

Can Americans not see what’s happening to their democracy?

The U.S., by ceding control of its institutions to their President, is seemingly, enthusiastically, moving towards becoming a third world junta.

With the summary firing of F.B.I. Director James Comey, President Donald Trump has further consolidated his power, by reigning in one of the last non-partisan checks and balances to administrative excess – an independent intelligence community.

We’re lucky there’s no Reichstag to burn down.

Hypothetically, if Trump and his campaign in fact colluded with Russia to secure the U.S. election, as the schoolyard bully would say, “whatya gonna do about it…?”

Indeed, with the F.B.I. effectively silenced, who or what is left to stop Donald Trump’s excesses?
Donald Trump controls the Executive Branch of government. He has the power of executive order, policy veto, control of foreign policy and the military, and the vaunted bully pulpit.

Donald Trump controls the Legislative branch of government; the House of Representatives and the Senate, the country’s law making bodies.

Donald Trump controls the judiciary branch, having appointed a conservative to complete the right wing majority. While it’s true that some local and regional judges can and have slowed some arbitrary fiats, they can’t stop them, with the right dominated Supreme Court as the final arbiter.

Donald Trump controls the media. His rhetoric, with complicit right wing outlets and shock jocks, has greatly reduced this major check and balance to executive power. The media is now seen by the masses as an enemy of the people. Gallup says only 32% of Americans have “some or great” trust in the American media.
Donald Trump controls the military, not just because he is Commander in Chief. He has solidified his control by filling his Cabinet with retired generals to shape and support foreign policy without inconvenient congressional oversight. His determination to increase military spending buys the allegiance of the U.S. military but also elevates his right to fire should he be questioned or disobeyed.
Donald Trump controls Wall Street. Promises of corporate tax cuts, eliminating regulation, a turn towards protectionism, and a willingness to use his office to punish or reward individual businesses or industries will keep corporate America enthusiastically in line.


Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin may well control the world. Many posit, and the facts are beginning to substantiate , that Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are fashioning an Ike-like worldwide military industrial complex- an oligarchy to control the world.

If world domination is a bit far fetched for you,at least consider this:

With Comey’s firing, Donald Trump now also controls the Intelligence Agencies of the U.S., and will soon have appointed his own people to head National Intelligence, N.S.A., C.I.A., and now the F.B.I.

So with Trump having control of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the US government, the military, the N.S.A., C.I.A. and F.B.I., who is there left to indict him or even investigate him should he commit indictable crimes?

With a hobbled media, what’s left of the checks and balances, the U.S. fathers fashioned to curb executive (Presidential) power?
With the capricious and summary firing of F.B.I. Director Comey, who or what is left to throw a President in the slammer should the situation warrant?

The worst thing about Comey’s firing is its purposely disrespectful process, the ludicrous reason given for the firing, and its actual, transparent purpose.
Everybody knows Comey was fired to end the investigation into Russian/Trump collusion, an investigation that was getting uncomfortably close to Mara Lago, er… the White House.

But given that Donald Trump controls not only the power sources of the U.S. but also their checks and balances, who’s left to call B.S.?

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Premier Clark Dismisses Horgan as a Leader Who Lacks a Spine

Now there’s an objective headline from Postmedia’s  Vancouver Sun, fast becoming a B.C. facsimile of Breitbart News.

In his full front page hack job of NDP leader John Horgan, columnist Rob Shaw allows Premier Clark to muse unchallenged about what she sees ( strictly clinically of course) to be Mr.Horgan’s shortcomings:

“I know people sort of thought (former NDP leader) Adrian Dix was flip-flopping, but John Horgan … has got a bigger problem in terms of finding his spine, finding his backbone. That was something I’ve learned about him over the last little while in watching the NDP.”

“John, he is not as strong a leader as I thought he would be,” said Clark. “He hasn’t been able to corral his caucus, there’s so much disunity in the group, they are always fighting with each other. He can’t seem to take a position on any of the important policies, things it’s obvious we are all going to have to take a position on.”

The fact that the Vancouver Sun would give the Premier a free front page to trash her political opponent without rebuttal is a terrifying indictment of what the paper has become.

With Global T.V. News offering nothing but traffic reports and recipes and C.K.N.W. solidly in the bag for the current  government, where can British Columbians possibly get any kind of factual information or analyses?

Shaw’s  swiftboating article also featured a photo of Premier Clark’s back, as she is symbolically walking back into the Parliament buildings. Disgraceful.

The Vancouver Sun has always shown it’s right wing stripes.They could be counted on to play a crucial role in past media coups of NDP Premiers, from Dave Barrett to Mike Harcourt to that other reviled Premier Clark.

Marjorie Nichols, Alan Fotheringham, et al, would carpet bomb them int0 submission for sins much less serious than any one of ten current or past Socred scandals. Still, there seemed to be some nuance required in their assassinations, and there was the occasional dissenting voice allowed, strictly to inoculate the public into accepting the paper’s objectivity.

But any pretence of objectivity has long since disappeared. This is the Sun’s most blatantly partisan story since the Supreme Court of Canada publicly spanked  Premier Clark’s government and forced  them to return B.C. school staffing levels to 2001 levels. So,after a fifteen year battle with a government the Supreme Court said acted unconstitutionally, what headline did the Vancouver Sun feel best encapsulated the story?

“Premier Hints at Extra Educational Funding” was the Sun’s headline.

Even worse,in this recent Horgan trashing piece, after columnist Rob Shaw had dutifully recorded all of Premier Clark’s ad hominem remarks about Mr H0rgan, he had the gall to include a most spectacular irony:

“Clark said she’s not worried about the race, because she prefers to focus on being positive.”

It would be laughable if not so viscious and inappropriate.

The Vancouver Sun has lost all objectivity.It has become a shameless government shill.

If you must read the Sun, do the crossword puzzle, find out how the Canucks did, but please, consider their significant and transparent political bias when reading any “news” story or op ed.



Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

B.C. Education Budget is Fake News

 In full rant recently, CNN’s Don Lemon, defined “fake news” as stories purposely concocted to mislead the public.

If that’s the criterion, government’s 2017 B.C. Education Budget is fake news. While the budget appears 256 million higher than 2016/2017, it does not represent the major
education funding increase it would have us believe.

Here’s there budget for 2017/18 and the proceeding two school years.bc-budget





Yahoo! Happy days are here again!

Substantial right? Well, not really. Not if one takes a look at how it actually shakes out.

Line 176 million – allotted for enrolment growth. This is a formula –  not a funding increase. Throughout many recent years of enrolment decline, lower per pupil funding was never described as “cuts” by the government – a formulaic increase cannot now be claimed as a funding increase.

Line 2120 million “annualized cost of interim agreement with B.C.T.F.(or more accurately,”teachers”). This money is to continue paying the teachers hired this spring as a result of the 50 million dollar “interim agreement to jump start”  addressing the Supreme Court of Canada decision against the Government. This is not a 2017/2018 funding increase, but a continuation of a 2016/2017 initiative.

Line 3 – 15 million – “for increased funding of student transportation.This is also continuation money for a transportation adjustment began last year. A cynic might say that transportation, the first thing cut by school districts years ago in response to annual funding cuts, was centrally resurrected to assure that students can get to their schools of choice.

This is not a funding increase, but another continuation cost of a previous policy.

Line 4 – 3 million – “ Rural education enhancement funding.” This is a sop to interior schools that the government has already announced will stay open despite local imperatives to close them in response to serial government budget cuts. This was committed to last year, and is a return of funding long removed, not a funding increase.

Line 5 – 28 million – “Relief of various school districts and other pressures”. This is the most dishonest of all the government’s budget   misrepresentations.

First, the money is pay back to school districts for downloaded expenditures already billed them for the “Next Generation Network”, a technological hardware upgrade.

Second, it’s not real money, merely the non- collection of an announced 2016/2017, 29 million dollar cut to “administration”.

Line 6 – 14 million – “Second “Economic Stability Dividend” – salary increase as per last year’s “affordability zone” contract.Increased educational funding? Hardly.

And finally, the 27.4 million dollars mentioned in the concluding paragraph for “curriculum implementation”. Clearly it was not included in the budget table because it is so obviously a mere re-imbursement of downloaded costs for curriculum resource needs paid by school districts in previous years.

In short, while the Education Budget has grown, there has been no significant increase in  education funding.

One would be remiss to not mention the  “Learning Enrichment Fund” into which the government will plough 100 million  dollars next year. The “L.I.F. , is a liquid fund,  controlled by the government, who can target it as they see fit. It’s a contingency fund, to offset litigation imperatives if it becomes absolutely unavoidable.

So, there is no  actual education funding increase for 2017/18.

Yet  once again, the government appears to be getting away with their claim that education funding will increase massively in next year’s budget.

It won’t.

Inarguably, and in pure Trump fashion, it’s fake news -fake news gone unchallenged by a media and public whose brains hurt from the government’s continuous  funding shell game. From multiple announcements of the same money to drive by, one year funding announcements, to cut and replace  funding, to representing routine maintenance as new funding, the misrepresentation and obfuscation is mind boggling.

It takes too much time, digging, and analysis to cut through the  subterfuge, and neither public nor media has much of a taste for it.

But the worst part of this fake news is that the government’s considerable circuitousness once again shows the considerable depth of their  animus toward public education .






Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Let Obamacare Go


The U.S. election is over and GOP zealots are almost peeing their pants to finally repeal Obamacare. Killing “job killing” Obamacare is their mantra, their raison d’être.It is their sacred duty to exorcise this creeping cancer. They don’t even know why anymore, their eyes are glazed over in hysterical solidarity.

Having spent most recent congressional sessions voting fifty six times to repeal it, they now have the troops and the mandate, to be successful on the fifty seventh and (hallelujah) ,the final,vote. “Can I get an amen?”

Instead of dying on this hill, Democrats should lay down their arms and let Republicans die on it.

Let it go.

Because Obamacare isn’t what progressive Americans wanted in the first place. It was a compromise, a sop to Cerberus, a watered down Republican scheme that was “the best we could hope for”. Many Democrats held their noses and supported Obamacare because at least it moved the ball down the field towards accepting health care as a right not a business venture.

Obamacare became the embodiment of evil immediately the black guy brought it in. It is the focal point of Obama hate, a dog whistle for racism and ungodly socialism.

GOP zealots and a compliant media have convinced 75% of Americans that Obamacare is bad and should be repealed.

So let it go.

Obamacare, though complex and a masterstroke of political finagling, is really not much. It’s a mandatory private insurance plan. Whoopee.The rest of the world shakes their collective heads.

Republicans want to repeal it and replace it with an optional private insurance plan of some ilk. (To be decided sometime after their repealing bile has subsided).

So let it go.

Let them remove Obamacare as a scapegoat that allows private health insurance companies to fleece the U.S. public with jacked up premiums and deductibles.

Let them transfer ownership of an untenable private health insurance system to themselves.

Let it go.

I know, Obamacare, was the first American homage to universal healthcare.

I know that lots of Presidents (and first ladies) tried and failed to reform heath care after having faced the withering blast of big pharma and lobbyists that carpet bomb any attempt at reform.

I know Obamacare was a modern miracle of political prestidigitation.

And I know Obamacare was a move forward. To require all people to have health insurance, and to help those who couldn’t afford it was a worthwhile goal. To outlaw “pre existing conditions”, lifetime caps and staying on parents plans until twenty six are things that even Republicans grudgingly support.

Ironically, the GOP “replacement” of Obamacare will be – guess what? While mumbling something about “state lines” and competition the GOP will come up with a  private insurance scheme in which companies can’t disqualify for pre existing conditions, can’t have a lifetime benefit cap, and must allow children to stay on their parents plan until they are 26. Sound familiar? It should, and it’s all the Republicans can do.

They can’t tell insurance companies, “OK, now that we’ve repealed that awful Obamacare, you can resume the life and death abuse you  foisted on Americans for a hundred years.

There’s nothing else they can do but re-fiddle Obamacare and perhaps re-name  it Trumpcare.

Without removing the profit motive from health care, the U.S. is doomed to a game of health care whack a mole – closing one care disqualifier as private companies find another way to disqualify patients or simply raise rates and blame the system.

Neither Obamacare nor any shiny new GOP system based on private insurance will work. They both depend on a model that expects private health insurers to serve the patient for a reasonable fee.

Currently, medical insurers get $.33 of every $1.00 spent in medical care.

Ultimately, it’s ending this travesty that will be the answer, not re jigging ways of having people pay $.33 of every dollar to pay for health centre waterfalls, foyers, and CEO bonuses.

So let Obamacare go Democrats, and work towards removing the profit motive from health care. Everyone knows this is the right answer but they are afraid of the fight and the unknown.

Let it go – and let the Republicans take their turn demonstrating the unfairness and inefficacy of for profit health care for a while.

Obamacare will still be President Obama’s legacy, and real, single payer health care may some day come to Americans out it’s modest beginnings.

But as long as Obamacare is around to take the blame for untenable health care costs, it will.

Let it go.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

F.S.A. Exams – A Political Football

AS I SEE IT – Jim Nelson

So the annual hand wringing over the Foundation Skills Assessments tests begins again: Why are teachers so dead against them? Is it just that awful B.C.T.F. being radical again?

Should we keep our children from writing thePhoto tests?

The trouble with the FSA is not the tests but how they are used.

F.S.A. exams are the B.C. banner of the accountability movement in education, a movement that has ruined American public schools over the last 20 years and yet is catching on in B.C. despite its disastrous effect on U.S. schools.

The accountability movement started in the U.S. and was born of the American tendency to analyze, regulate and measure things.

A good example of this is the development of American football.

Now, I enjoy an NFL game as much as much as the next person but a look at American football’s metamorphosis from rugby is instructive in understanding the development of the accountability movement in education.

Americans didn’t play rugby for long; rather, they quickly felt the need to change it, to regulate and delineate the hell out of it. They divided the field into one-yard segments with 200 hash marks, added five officials, helmets and padding, statistics, instant replay, score clocks and down chains. They broke the game into quarters. Time-outs, huddles, motion rules, penalties — with designated yards for designated offences — all marched off precisely. There are signals for everything, a ritualized kicking game and 300-page playbooks with X’s and O’s and arrows.

Instead of rugby, with one ball, one referee, an emphasis on spontaneity and creativity, and an almost chivalrous adherence to fair play, our southern cousins ended up with football, a testament to rules, measures, specialization and intervention. I reiterate that I love watching NFL football.

But back to the analogy.

Unfortunately, the same cultural compulsion that changed rugby into American football proved unhelpful when applied to education.

Because education is like rugby. It is interactive, free-flowing, spontaneous and creative. It’s not easily quantifiable, pre-packaged or measured. It is too complex to be judged by a standardized measure, no matter how strong the cultural imperative may be to do so.

How can a standardized test measure the “A-ha!” moment when a student suddenly appreciates the brilliance of Shakespeare? How can it measure the ability to co-operate or persevere or to help another student?

Learning takes place through relationships with peers and teachers. It can only be measured somewhat accurately using an aggregation of many and varied assessments, both objective and anecdotal.

We all wish it was simpler, that we could judge how students are doing with a simple urine sample or a multiple-guess test.

My opinion, although I’m a bit radical, is that an even more accurate indication of how well your child is learning is whether they are happy at school, whether they feel safe, are confident and engaged at school. If they “like” the teacher, have friends, feel good about their studies and enjoy school, they are learning just fine.

The B.C.T.F. is dead right on this issue. Although the union brings up red herrings such as how the poor children suffer undue stress when asked to write tests or how the poor teachers have to mark them, or the time it takes out of the curriculum or that the reason they are no good is because of demographic differences, yada yada yada, these are peripheral reasons for objecting to the FSA.

Teachers and the B.C.T.F. know viscerally that trying to legitimize standardized measures is harmful to our schools and, thus, our children’s learning. They are the only ones standing against the accountability movement.

As a former school principal in the Tri-Cities, I applaud this stance. Were my children in Grade 7, I would encourage them to not write the F.S.A. exams. Had I a child in Grade 4, I would send him to school and quietly but firmly instruct the school that he is not to write the F.S.A. exams and that perhaps half an hour in the gymnasium or on the playing field might be a good alternative.

Jim Nelson is a retired Tri-City teacher and Principal.


Following is “Turfin’ FSA,” sung to the tune of the Beach Boys’ “Surfin’ U.S.A.-by Jim Nelson and Dennis Secret:

Turfin’ F.S.A

If everybody had a notion, ’round District 43,

We’d call BS on the testing and we’d go on a spree,

We’ll throw ‘em all in the dumpster, autonomy has its day,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

We’re giving testing the boot,

’Cause it just don’t compute.

And then we’ll set our sights on, the Fraser Institute.

Every district in B.C. will see us leadin’ the way,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

$50 Million? Look Out B.C. Teachers, You’re Being Fleeced.

PhotoCall me a cynic, but B.C.’s teachers shouldn’t accept a nickel from the B.C. government until the government publicly explains what the money represents.

B.C. teachers and government negotiators have reached a deal to add $50 million dollars to the system this year to “jump start” negotiations. Neither side wanted “children and schools to suffer” while complex negotiations went on.

But what is this money? Is it a small down payment on a larger debt, or “new money” as chronically tone deaf Minister Mike Bernier posits? Will government try to sell it to voters as “new money” or what it actually is – a small portion of returned heist money?

And unless what it represents is clear, the beatings at the hands of the government will continue, despite their embarrassing and long overdue trip to the woodshed at the hands of the Supreme Court of Canada.

While $50 million dollars will be a welcome first drip in refilling the education bucket kicked over by Christy Clark in 2001’s contract stripping, the money represents different things to different people.

To public school advocates and educators, $50 million is a quick down payment on a much larger settlement, to be negotiated later. The B.C.T.F. has conservatively pegged the amount taken from schools over sixteen years at $300 million (it’s likely closer to $2 billion). Teachers think negotiations have just begun, and that more money will be forthcoming.

To the B.C government, $50 million is merely a strategic political move.

First, $50 million allows the government to buy educational altruism in the minds of voters fed up with sixteen years of B.C.’s education wars.

“The Supreme Court said we’ve been bad and mean for sixteen years; but now we’re excited about investing more money in children because now we suddenly care about public education- families first!” ( somewhat paraphrased)

$50 million buys the government a tube of culpability ointment which they will apply liberally (pun intended) from now until May’s election.

Second, to the government, $50 million is not a down payment, it’s a cap. Because there’s a provincial election in May they won’t ever be required to give a higher sum than $50 million.

Were the government to lose May’s election, they need only sit in opposition and snipe about why the new government wasn’t following the Supreme Court of Canada’s judgment, a process which their government had magnanimously just begun?

And should the government win May’s election, they will be purged of all sins and be able to claim a mandate for their prudent educational governance.

And don’t forget the card teachers have just dealt the government. If pressed, the government can now finally point to a successful, meaningful negotiation with teachers.

They also have the “taxpayers can’t afford anymore/ no one can negotiate with this militant union” strategy, which they can easily resurrect, having given so much new money to education.

Armed with a new mandate, how expeditiously might we expect further negotiations to go? Having won the election while touting a huge, $50 million dollar infusion of “new money” into the system, does anyone actually think they would immediately offer more the following year?

In the unlikely event they were forced, by the public, the media, or whatever Supreme Court police assure people comply with court rulings, a media honeymooning government might toss another $20 million of “new money” at education in year two, and perhaps a few million the following year.

To the government, this $50 million agreement represents at least a settlement cap, at worst, the final solution.

Let’s be clear. This provincial government has proven its dishonorable intentions since Christy Clark’s original sin in 2001 and sixteen years of pogrom and obfuscation.

B.C.T.F President Glen Hansman, social media and even Vaughan Palmer have adamantly described the $50 million dollars as a small refund on money unconstitutionally taken from schools.

But in discussing the $50 million dollar agreement, Education Minister Mike Bernier emphasized repeatedly that the $50 million was “new money ” piled upon the substantial 5 billion plus the government already gives to public education, despite plummeting enrolment. (up significantly since 2001 zzzzzz..)

The Supreme Court settlement is the only thing teachers have that can get this government to put any money into education.

By allowing government to take education off the front burner for this election cycle and tout $50 million dollars of “new money” as meaningful atonement for their sins, teachers may have sold their leverage at a bad time and far too cheaply.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Five Steps to Buck Up for B.C. Education

PhotoMy two kids were lucky enough to graduate from Tri City high schools, one in ’99 and one in 2001. They were lucky because they graduated just before  government cuts  began to affect educational resources  and programmes.

Now they’re both high school teachers in the same school district (one at his alma mater). Neither can believe the scarcity of  resources and paucity of student opportunity compared with when they were in school. Art, shop programmes, Journalism, Library, sports teams, drama, after school activities have seemingly withered away they often report when they (too seldom) drop by Mom and Dad’s.

Ancient technology,neglected maintenance, field trips – things that make school memorable and developmentally important to kids. Public schools have moved back in time and it’s possible they won’t get their vibrancy  back.

The B.C. government seems to  think PISA scores and measurable outcomes is what counts.They believe that teaching is easy, a soft touch, and that teachers require instruction and curricula from Ministry people unschooled in school and learning.

Every education initiative, announcement and re-announcement is a political strategy. Suspicion and disrespect for public schools and teachers permeates their actions and words.

And it’s so discouraging to see our public schools going the way of U.S. public schools.
The strategies are the same. Tried  and true. Defund,measure, indict,and repeat until the public is on side and demands “choice”, vouchers, merit pay, testing, measurable outcomes.

Do we have to go down this old, potholed, school privatization road?
Most, who know education, know public schooling is not that mysterious, and will only fail if we continue to Goebbles it into disrepute, using standardized testing ,underfunding and union bashing as weapons and corporate profiteers for patrons.

We don’t have to continue, like lemmings, down this road over the privatization cliff.  Why would we in B.C. want to ape U.S. public school strategies, repeatedly proven the least successful public school strategies in the world?

We don’t have to. It’s not that complicated.

What if instead , we did these five things:

1) Funded public schools( not private schools) equitably & adequately – no, I mean really.

2) Demanded extensive training for teachers – perhaps Masters degrees.

3)  Negotiated broad,reasonable terms of employment and budgets, leaving details to local  districts. ( end per pupil funding)

4) Allowed teachers professional autonomy for designing the teaching and learning within broad provincial curricula established by educators.

5) Adjusted teacher’s salaries to be the second or third highest in  Canada, then committed  to meeting annual cost of living increases in hard costs and teacher and support staff salaries.

We’ve done half of  number 4 already, although we did it badly, offering scant consultation and no money for implementing sweeping new curricula.

Alas, we have made no attempt at the other four suggestions however and they, or a similar amalgam are the only way to resurrect our wounded public school system.

By doing so,perhaps B.C. could avoid the following, frightening statistic:

U.S.      – 50% of public school teachers leave the profession within 5 years of entering it.

Finland- 97% of public school teachers remain in what is seen as a career, not a job.

Given this statistic, no PISA test is required to determine which country’s education system is operating more successfully. (One might be quite surprised to discover which system is more expensive, however.)

I wonder if my own two, high school teacher children will continue to see teaching as a calling,as in Finland  or just a poorly paid job ,as it’s seen in the U.S. and increasingly in B.C.

There has been a significant disrespect for teachers and public schools  baked into B.C.’s battle fatigued public by the government’s fifteen year vendettta.

Sure, it’s about serial funding cuts and eroding salary. But it’s the continuous disdain and disrespect heaped on schools and teachers that has really drooped the shoulders of  B.C. public educators. Too many teachers have been forced to teach defensively to cope – closing classroom doors, pulling out worksheets, hoping to make it through the week. Embracing volunteer activities with kids or going for a Friday beer or to a staff get together is not even an option to many, stressed teachers.

If we don’t rehabilitate our commitment to public schools soon, they will  be beyond repair, physically and politically.

I don’t want my uniform clad grandchildren to be bussed across town to a “Learning Academy ” that stresses rigour,test results and competition and is run for profit by poorly trained and paid trainees and corporate consultant.

Rather, I want them to walk ,with friends, to and from their neighbourhood school, where the grass is cut,the weeds pulled, and the school freshly painted. I want their teachers to be enthusiastic and well trained, empathetic and patient. I want my grandchildren to be active in school activities that are happily supervised and organized by teachers who have the time and inclination to do so.

What could possibly be a better investment in our future?

It’s about money and respect. A lot of money and a lot of respect. Teachers and public schools have gone  fifteen years with little of either.

Come on B.C. Let’s take the five steps above, buck up and defend our kids schools, their embattled teachers and support workers, and parenthetically, my own two ,not quite completely disillusioned, children.


Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

12 Days of Christymas

We all know someone had to do it…

On the 12th day of Christmas the Premier gave to us;

12   Years of bad faith

11   Trumplike Tweets

10  Nine ways of cutting

9    Purchased Trollers

8   District downloads

7  Re- announcements

6  Crooked Appeal Courts

5  Impish grins

4 Stacked LRBs

3 Judicial spankings 

2 Loony Ministers

1  And another lump of coal for schools.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“School Choice”

 Re-posted from  Nov.22nd, 2013



We’ve got lots of options and “choices” in our  public schools.

Early education, adult education, French Immersion, Montessori, special needs, gifted, music, drama, technology, behaviour, alternate, and  E.S.L   programmes- to name just a few. There are schools that specialize in Fine Arts, extended athletic programmes, and Career Preparation – there’s no shortage of choice in public schools.

“More school choice” isn’t a clamour for more programme options; it’s a dog whistle for more private options. Proponents of school choice want taxpayers to fund private options that will separate their child from the riff raff of different religions, cultures or of inferior ability or class.

While Canadians strongly resist two tiered health care, they seem to readily accept a two or three tiered, education system.

But we shouldn’t.

By any measure, Public Education in Canada has been and is one of Canada’s most successful social initiatives.

Canadian public schools are considered to be in the top five systems in the world, by international measures in Science, Math and Language Arts. One reason is that 95% of Canadian children still go to public schools respected and supported by Canadians.

And that’s what makes education  work- equity of opportunity, respect for public schools,and as Finland has proven crucial, extensive teacher training and professional autonomy.

For almost two hundred years, public schools have shaped Canadian culture and values.

Look at how Canadians observe Remembrance Day each November. We learned this directly from annual public school assemblies.

It’s not an accident that Canadians are polite and nice. It’s not genetic, it’s learned; in our public schools.

Public schools sculpt Canadian tolerance and empathy. They reinforce a shared history, quiet pride in country, and they keep us from the tyranny of class systems like those found in countries that encourage private schooling.

All Canadian children should attend local public schools. They shouldn’t be separated by religion, socio- economic status, colour or country of origin. They shouldn’t be home schooled, attend religious schools, Charter schools,Swedish Orthodox schools, or “Learning Academies” requiring uniforms and a private bus ride forty- five minutes across town.

Our children need to be in their neighbourhood school, with other children of different kinds, cultures and backgrounds. It’s best for our country and it’s best for them. And it’s so much more important to our children’s development than is succumbing to our misguided vicarious ambitions for our children.

Too often we mistakenly think school uniforms, more rigour, mindless compliance, discipline, and unrelenting pressure to excel is what’s needed at a time when what’s actually needed is  kids  just enjoying their childhood.


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Leap Manifesto – it’s getting less scary.

PhotoDon’t leap to conclusions or let the manifesto part scare you. The leap idea,  is  a sensible and exciting concept. Leapers say that incremental environmental steps are no longer sufficient interventions and that taking the “leap” toward non- carbon producing energy is the only way to save the planet.

Leaping proposals include:

  • Shifting swiftly away from fossil fuels so that Canada gets 100 per cent of its electricity from renewable resources within 20 years and is completely off fossil fuels by 2050.
  • No new infrastructure projects aimed at increasing extraction of non-renewable resources, including pipelines.
  • “Energy democracy,” in which energy sources are  controlled by communities not  private companies.
  • An end to trade deals “that interfere with our attempts to rebuild local economies, regulate corporations and stop damaging extractive projects.”
  • Expand low-carbon sectors of the economy, such as caregiving, teaching, social work, the arts and public-interest media.
  • Declaring that “austerity – which has systematically attacked low-carbon sectors like education and health care while starving public transit and forcing energy privatizations – is a  form of thinking that has become a threat to life on earth.
  • Paying for it all by ending fossil fuel subsidies, financial transaction taxes, increasing resource royalties, raising taxes on corporations and the wealthy, introducing a progressive carbon tax, and by cutting military spending.

Given the climate change catastrophes we’re witnessing and the environmental imperative most of us feel, the “leap” to be off carbon producing power within 20 years seems an almost conservative goal. One can tell “leaping” is an idea whose time is fast approaching by the fact that one feels like saying,”do we have that long to wait”?

Let’s not dismiss the idea of “leaping” toward an environmental solution just because we don’t like the connotation of the word “manifesto” or because it is written by lefties who delight in using incendiary, anti- corporate language, just to upset us.

The oil industry will scream bloody murder – they’re the most powerful lobby there is – but they know the time left for them to jack up gas prices before long weekends is growing short.

Early in U.S. President Obama’s mandate, the automobile industry supported his proposal that all cars  must achieve a minimum 35  MPG  within five years, because they preferred its predictability – they knew it was coming and planned for it .

Similarly, if the oil industry  knew up front that 2050 was the drop dead date for fossil fuels, their transition to other endeavours would be equally as predictable and more palatable.

The technology is there. Denmark is approaching country wide zero carbon electricity and other countries are getting close surprisingly painlessly.

Considering Denmark’s success and the commonplace floods and droughts and climate anomalies we see every day, the Leap Manifesto is becoming less and less scary.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“That Other Party” on Education

The American school system is completely broken. The quote below is from a recent Donald Trump   Jr. speech. It shows the complete lack of understanding most Americans have about what public schooling is;

The other party gave us public schools that far too often fail our students, especially those who have no options. Growing up, my siblings and I we were truly fortunate to have choices and options that others don’t have. We want all Americans to have those same opportunities. Our schools used to be an elevator to the middle class, now they’re stalled on the ground floor. They’re like Soviet-era department stores that are run for the benefit of the clerks and not the customers, for the teachers and the administrators and not the students. You know why other countries do better on K through 12? They let parents choose where to send their own children to school. That’s called competition. It’s called the free market. And it’s what the other party fears. They fear it because they’re more concerned about protecting the jobs of tenured teachers than serving the students in desperate need of a good education. They want to run everything top-down from Washington. They tell us they’re the experts and they know what’s best.

The free market – learning and public schooling are products, to be squeezed and purchased by discerning, parent consumers, who along with shrewd entrepreneurs,are the real educational experts.

In this analysis, there is no room for public education- the most successful collective initiative of western societies. There is no recognition that public education needs a collective public commitment, adequate support and resources, comprehensive teacher training, and professional autonomy.

To them, schooling is merely the purveying of knowledge, without developmental, cultural, or other affective benefit.

This Trump Jr. rant  expresses a preference for class strata, preferred experience, inequitable opportunity, and reduced social mobility.

Don’t fall for “school choice” or “parent choice” cries. They are simply euphemisms for “let’s fund private schools so my kid doesn’t have to mix with the riff raff left to wallow in under supported, dilapidated  public schools…”

Oh,, and don’t fall for the newest private school dog whistle.

” I think the money should follow the student not go to the schools…”

Per pupil funding, vouchers, and Charter School grants are vehicles which allow governments to encourage private school attendance and simultaneoulsy de-value public schools.

U.S. public schools are like educational  lemmings, and if our Socred government has its way, we in BC will soon be following them over the cliff.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Thank You For Your Service to Our Country

Ever wonder why Canadians are universally considered “nice”… and tolerant, considerate, and terminally apologetic?



Some of these things have been bred into us by family and are reflected in our social structures.

And there are historical, and anthro/sociological forces that have contributed to our Canadian persona.

But the architects, the purveyors of our Canadianism are our public schools.

Traits of Canadian character are mortared deep within our children during their thirteen years of attending Canadian public schools.

Each day during their most developmentally crucial years, our children spend six hours learning Canadian niceness and tolerance, practicing it, and seeing it modelled and encouraged by peers and adult mentors.

Our public schools have provided Canada a level educational playing field.They provide equity of educational opportunity, and in so doing, are the main vehicle of social mobility.

Public schools are what keeps Canada from having an identifiable class system, unlike other countries with private schools that inevitably separate people and promote inequality of opportunity.

Our public schools have taught us Canadian culture. They are why Canadians solemnly “observe” remembrance of military sacrifice and its horror rather than rhapsodizing about military heroism.

A Canadian observance of  religious holidays, festivals, and important occasions of other cultures  is learned in our public schools.

And the above  are only the cultural contributions made by public schools. The service they provide in the personal development of children is equally, if not more, profound.

Public schooling has been the most successful initiative of western democracies, and those who provide it serve our country as fundamentally as does any uniformed Canadian.

I want a ribbon to go on my car’s bumper that says “ I Support Canada’s Public Schools and Educators”.

I want to see a group of public school teachers march onto the field during half time of the Grey Cup Game so we can publicly thank them for their service to our country; for helping to pass on  Canadian values, beliefs, and culture to us all.

So, to all public educators, whose profound contributions are too often lost to the hand wringing of  fiscal austerity;

Thank you for your service to our country.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

B.C. Public Education Funding Announcements – New Rules


As we approach next year’s provincial election, it would seem prudent to establish a few Maher -like rules to govern the myriad education funding announcements we are in for over the next few months.

New Rule # 1)

With each new announcement of Ministry of Education largesse, Minister Bernier has to subtract the amount currently being doled out from the 4.2 billion removed from public education since 2001. He must supply a running total of returned money, which now, at rudimentary computation stands at about 4.160 billion  outstanding.

New Rule # 2)

The running total of how much money has yet to be returned to public education must be broadcast on CKNW every day, by every broadcaster.
In addition, Keith Baldrey has to tweet the up to date numbers daily, without sarcasm or impugning the teachers union.

New Rule # 3)

The amounts doled out must be parsed as to which political party’s MLA holds the ridings to which money has been gifted. For example, the millions announced for capital funding in Surrey went to constituencies where what percentage of annointed districts are represented by which party’s  MLAs?

New Rule #4

When making announcements about increased funding, the phrases “ as a result of good fiscal management “ and “because of our strong economic performance” may not be used to preface announcements unless sitcom laugh track is played and vomit bags are supplied to the audience.

New Rule #5

With every new funding announcement regardless of how small, routine, or re-announced, neither Premier Clark nor Minister Bernier may laugh , giggle, or even smirk at their Everest – like political cynicism.

These rules are effective immediately ; in force until the election is over ,or until Premier Clark and/or Minister Bernier collapse in laughter at our stupidity.




Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Ten Vancouver Tourism Slogans for February

After the wettest couple of months ever, Tourism B.C. is struggling to come up with catchy new ad slogans to get the world to come to the coast in February.

Here are some suggestions:

1) “ Californians are flocking to Vancouver, there’s no drought about it…”

2) “ Come and enjoy Vancouver’s fifty shades of grey lifestyle…”

3) “ Come to Vancouver – it’s just like that plain in Spain…”
4) “ Vancouver, winter home of the Canadian Olympic storm watching  team.

5) “ Shell Busey says, “Vancouver – good, wetter, west…”

6) “ Come to Vancouver- it’s wet, but it’s a dry wet.”

7) “ Come to Vancouver and leave that greasy suntan oil behind…”

8) “ Super, saturated, British Columbia.”

9) “ Come to Vancouver , no resevoirations needed.”

10) “ Enjoy B.C.’s great outdoors – now with no campfire restrictions…”


Please feel free to add your own.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Five Steps to B.C.’s Education Underfunding Strategy


 1)Make a large, ongoing cut to the education budget – perhaps 29 million this year and 25 million next year. Call them “cuts to administration ” so it sounds as if fat cats are the only ones affected.

2) Announce and re-announce much smaller annual increases in per pupil funding –        don’t mention increasing hard costs like Hydro rates, heat, MSP rate hikes, or salary increments. Be sure to emphasize that these increases are in place despite dropping enrollment.

 3) Insist that building and programme inadequacies are due to local district budgeting  decisions, not provincial underfunding.

 4) Increase funding for private schools to draw off some fully funded students.

 5)  Sound confused and hurt when people complain about education cuts.


Repeat Steps 1- 5 as often as required – at least annually.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Raise Our Taxes Please

PhotoAs counterintuitive as it may seem, we, in Canada and especially here in B.C., are under taxed.

We don’t pay enough taxes to support the basic public services we require.

We’ve been sold a lot of things over the years: the world is flat, smoking is good for you, climate change is a hoax, and other demonstrably ridiculous ideas,but one of the most diabolical of silly theories is the one we’ve been sold for years, that:

“Tax increases cause us to have less money, and tax cuts allow us to have more money.”

 Most of us believe this is true. It isn’t. Actually, the opposite is true. Tax cuts are invariably flat and thus benefit the wealthy.

The 25% tax cut by Gordon Campbell’s BC Liberal government in 2001 was a gift to the wealthy – let’s see, 25% of 2 million per year or 25% of $30,000 per year – who benefits more from this tax cut?

In addition, the less tax we pay, the more government revenues must be coaxed out of “flat” sources – sources where we all pay the same, regardless of income or wealth. User fees, tolls, casino revenues, medical premiums, license fees, and other flat strategies have replaced taxation as the source of government revenue.

And what do all these sources have in common? They’re flat – the poor pay the same as the wealthy.

The aggregate of what we pay these sources amounts to far more than what we’d pay under  a sensible, transparent, progressive tax system.

Interest groups, right wing think tanks,and the Canadian  Taxpayers Association constantly tell us we’re overtaxed. The reason they continuously rant against any tax increase is because taxation of income and/or wealth is the only source of government revenue that can be made progressive if we so choose.

Progressive taxation affects the wealthy instead of just squeezing money from the average citizen.

Our own B.C. government are masters of the flat revenue funding sources. While proudly insisting they haven’t raised taxes, our provincial government scoops 1.2 billion from gambling revenues, 862 million from the L.C.B, 480 million from ICBC, 1.23 billion from B.C. Hydro and 1.61 million in bridge tolls.

When these entities raise their rates, we all pay more each year – and we all pay the same. Jim Pattison or minimum wage renter, we pay the same ICBC increase, Hydro and ferry increase, the same tolls, MSP rates, license fee increases, and more.

We have been carefully taught to direct our frustration with our constantly diminished purchasing power on high taxes and public overspending. We take up the chant that we’re taxed too much and couldn’t possibly pay any more.

But we’re not overtaxed; we’re crippled by fee increases and taxation replacements.

If our government(s) would spend less time inventing ways to scoop flat rate revenue from us all and instead establish a fair, transparent, and progressive tax system, we would all benefit- and ordinary people would pay less.

So…it’s not unreasonable for us to actually clamber for higher taxes, instead of resisting them and paying more.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

I’ll Be Prone For Christmas

A ditty written wistfully, a day or two before December dismissal  by a stressed out educator.

I’ll Be Prone for Christmas  ( to the tune of “I’ll be Home For Christmas”)

I’ll be Prone for Christmas, not to be too crass,

But Christmas schtick and getting sick, may put me on my ass.

Saturday will find me, in contended slouch,

I’ll be prone for Christmas, dibs on the downstairs couch.

I’ll do dick this Christmas, mid herald angels harkenin’,

I’ll close the door , won’t read Dufour, my saw I won’t be sharpenin’.

Fifteen days relaxin’, a humbug, no not me,

I’ll be home for Christmas , but horizontally.



Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Terror From the East

In light of Monday’s liberating Canadian election, Here’s a blog from about a year ago that expresses one of the many frustrations that led Canadians to toss the bums out.  

Terror From the East –Nov 7th, 2014

Run for your lives, the Jihadists are at the palace gates.

Is that the response Canadians are supposed to have to the recent tragic shooting in Ottawa?

And you want us to hijack the solemnity of Remembrance Day to ruminate about jihadists in the closet as we remember not just two world wars but various American led actions in oil rich foreign lands?

Sorry Andy, but this Remembrance Day I will, as usual, take time to solemnly remember those who died in two world wars. I’ll wear my poppy, and reflect about what those young soldiers endured and about the horrors of war.

But I won’t sully Remembrance Day by joining you, Stephen Harper, and Peter McKay in looking for terrorists under every rock, and wringing my hands about impending jihad.

Make no mistake; I too am concerned with what effect the shooting in Ottawa will have on our country. But it’s not the jihadists I’m afraid of, it’s the hysterical response of our government, who stand poised to parlay the actions of a disturbed individual into a rationale for dismantling our civil liberties.

Last summer, my wife and I arrived in Ottawa on a warm fall day. We weren’t on Parliament Hill five minutes when we ran into our M.P. Finn Donnelly strolling down the sidewalk. We had a nice chat and noticing Olivia Chow walking down toward the main block, we called her over for a conversation and a selfie.

No R.C.M.P. in sight, no secret service, no militia or machine guns. We both came away teary eyed by Canada’s political openness.

And nothing has changed. Canada is still the same, despite jihadist hysteria and the actions of a lone   man who tragically found a focus for his rage and a chance for fifteen minutes of fame.

In response, Tories now want to spend 1.2 billion on attack drones, ease preventative detention and arrest requirements, introduce national security bills, and expand counter terrorism programmes and electronic surveillance.

You may be correct in thinking that on Remembrance Day Canadians should re-double their vigilance, but we needn’t look as far east as you suggest to find those who would harm our Canadian way of life.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ah, the Low Hanging Fruit Gambit



Low Hanging Fruit Actually High Handed Decision Making


The B.C government is really pushing the anti education envelope in it’s recently announced three year school budget plan.

They call their latest demand for  cuts to school administration “low hanging fruit”; you know, the kind that’s hanging over the fence and easily picked.

What the tortured and inapt  metaphor ignores however is that the education tree has not only been picked clean years ago ,we’ve devoured the windfalls, and already committed future crops to fill historic crop shortages.

It’s not about low hanging fruit, it’s about pressing percieved advantage and kicking public education while it’s down. It’s about control, centralization, and privatization, and chopping down the public education tree out of long standing political spite and petulance.

2002 Minister of Education Christy Clark’s stripping of contract provisions for class size and composition declared her determination to regain control of education in B.C., control the Liberal Government perceived as slipping away to teachers. Fourteen years later, she’s still fighting that battle.

In 2002, blowback, both political and judicial, was significant, and the Liberal government had to draw in it’s claws for a while. It’s important to note however, that this battle for control of education still underpins government decision-making in B.C.

Whether personal or political, Christy Clark has shown an almost obsessive  animus toward teachers and public education.

Since the big stink in 2002, the Liberal government has been satisfied to annually poke public education in the eye, with small annual per pupil funding increases which were more than consumed by inflationary hard costs. (Hydro rates, M.S.P increases, unfunded salary settlements, carbon offsets, special needs and other downloaded costs.)

It’s been a simple and effective strategy. Each year, they cite education as a priority in a family first agenda, and each year they muse confusedly about why school districts can’t manage within the annual per pupil increases they supply.

Until now, the media and the public have generally bought the government’s strategy.

While the underfunding data are there and are the real unpicked low hanging fruit, it takes a while to get that while districts lose $8,000.00 plus for every student lost, they don’t accrue anywhere near $8,000.00 in reduced costs. (A school still has to light and heat classrooms as it loses $24,000 for the three students who left the school).

So we’ve had fourteen years of budget increases that equate to cuts.

But few, except for educators, complain. We’ve become blasé about cuts – how bad could they be if there’s a nominal funding increase each year?

In the face of increased griping by the education community, much of the public has become immune to the plight of public schools.

Media support can only be described as tepid. Instead, the media has been satisfied with a “pox on both their houses” stance, merely repeating and rewriting each other’s anecdotal  indictments. The only stories with legs are the ones which involve union overreach.

No young Woodward and Bernsteins are being tasked with uncovering the real problems of education underfunding in B.C.

For a tired, bombarded public,problems in school funding must be a result  of  local district incompetence or teachers getting paid too much, or a horrible, militant union.
So the fourteen year death by a thousand cuts funding strategy has been accepted by many British Columbians as prudent and frugal, after all “throwing money at the problem won’t help…”

But this year, after so many years of surgically nipping at the edges of education, buoyed by public frustration and teacher battle fatigue, the government launched a new offensive in its relentless  battle to show who’s boss in education.

“ I’ll bet we could sell cutting millions more from public education if we pulled a switcheroo and cut bloated administration costs. Everyone hates high paid administrators, even teachers. Some say we’ve been hard on teachers, this way we’ll appear frugal and fair.”

“ And the most diabolical thing” said this hypothetical brainstormer, ” is that we could more than recoup the pittance we had to give teachers to settle the strike, which would make the strike seem even more futile and at the same time, send a strong message about who’s in charge of education in this province.”

This, admittedly hypothetical reconstruction is the only possible explanation for the government’s move into overt attack mode instead of being satisfied with merely delivering education the annual stiff poke in the eye.

To those who don’t know, “administration” isn’t just highly paid superintendents and Principals. Secretaries, curriculum experts, and other personel qualify too.

The cuts have already been made – for years. To satisfy this latest Sheriff of Nottingham money grab, school districts won’t just be cutting martini swilling excess from places that seldom see kids. They’ll be cutting services to classrooms and kids, to meet the number, the same thing they’ve been doing for fourteen  years.

What the Government calls low hanging fruit, is actually more high handed decision making-  an acceleration of their almost inexplicable vendetta against public schools.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Schools Offer Our Kids More Than We Think

Most people, including educators, don’t know what’s important about schools. We inaccurately talk about and measure that which is least important.

So what are the important things about schooling? Here’s some things more important than test scores:

Walking to and from school with friends every day.

Being in classes with smart kids, not so smart kids, troubled kids, and kids of different socio economic and cultural groups. Being in classes with kids with special needs.

Practicing making decisions in a safe place away from parents. Learning to work with others. Learning to accept disappointment and relate to teachers and adults.

Learning the value of routine, of striving, and accepting responsibility.

Learning to self regulate behaviour and effort.

Getting turned on to a special interest, sport, activity, or subject.

Having fun in school and enjoying the experience.

Learning to be a good citizen, tolerant and supportive of others and willing to contribute to a group goal or help individual kids learn.

Being kind, thoughtful, and empathetic.

Learning to be calm, happy, challenged, and unafraid of life.

These are the most important things that public schools, with support, offer.

None of these things can be measured except through continued, subjective observation by parent, student, and teacher.

If school gives my child these things, I don’t care about high marks, standardized test results, uniforms, discipline, or keeping them away from the riff raff.

The competition, and the various sorting strategies we use to classify success in school don’t encourage kids to learn – only to win.

Tests, tough discipline, competition are the simple things that we cling to when we don’t understand or appreciate public education’s real mandate and contribution.

We seldom talk about these important things.

Instead, we analyze literacy scores, Math awards, best athlete, honours classes, IB, and test scores – anything to measure success and feed our need for vicarious triumph, when high scores are actually the least important thing public schooling offers children.

We mistakenly believe academic performance has something to do with wearing a school uniform. We think it important enough to pay big bucks, drive to cross town learning academies or preparatory colleges.

We think academic rigour important enough to pay to keep our children away from public school riff raff, be they special needs, a different religion or (gasp) no religion at all. Some think their children learn better when kept away from students of different races, socio economic classes, or academic abilities.

If your child likes her school, if she is happy there and likes her teachers, she is likely doing just fine. Leave her and the school, alone. Share her successes unconditionally. Let her own her schooling. If you see a problem, quietly find out from the school what’s happening and work with them to make it appear as if your child has solved the problem herself, rather than having mommy or daddy fix it for her.

The most important thing we can do for our children is to let them go to a neighbourhood school on their own terms. They are learning to be their own person and they need to practice without our manipulating each bump and difficulty.

Everything we do as parents should be supportive of getting our kids to take charge of their own schooling and enjoy their school days – they have plenty of time for mortgage worries and scrabbling for success.

Once they do take responsibility, you have only to sit back and cheer.

That’s what schools offer our kids, and it’s a huge contribution – especially if we let it happen, instead of obsessing over competition, results, test scores, and strict discipline.



Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Colonel Sanders Abreast of Medical Firings Scandal

The headline should have read:

“ Liberal Government Suggests Colonel Sanders  Investigate Missing Chickens Scandal.”

That’s how ridiculous the government’s suggestion that Ombudsperson, Jay Chalke, is just the person to unravel the scandal surrounding the Liberal’s Reaganesque firing of eight medical researchers in 2012.

Even though Mr. Chalke likely oozes integrity from every pore, this inquiry would be impossible for him to complete with any credibility.

Mr.Chalke is an ex Liberal Assistant Deputy Minister who led the Justice Service Branch from 2011 until 2015. The medical firings were in 2012, during his tenure. Mr. Chalke could hardly have been unaware of the action, even if he only heard about it over cocktails at the Bengal Lounge.

Mr. Chalke was appointed Ombudsperson scant weeks ago – May 26th, 2015. In other words, this scandal was already percolating when he was appointed provincial watchdog.

Skeptics might accuse Mr. Chalke of being a Liberal homer. They might suspect that the ensconcing of a Liberal team member as ombudsperson might have been a strategy in anticipation of the burgeoning public outcry surrounding this festering scandal.

Because an Ombudsperson’s investigation is the government’s last chance to keep control of the situation.

Other government attempts to quell the outrage over the medical firings have only served to inflame public sentiment.

They tried to choke it off with a full investigation by the public service agency. This turned out to be a bit of a frost, as Victoria lawyer Marcia McNeil’s mandate was neither to place blame nor determine whether or not the firings were warranted.

“Although many mistakes were made, no disciplinary action is recommended or considered.”

This did not satisfy anyone.

The Government tried settling with those fired, reinstating some and giving cash settlements to others.

Premier Christy Clark personally apologized to the families of those fired.

This still did not satisfy the public. A person had died because of these firings.

The public and the media demanded specifics. They wanted names named.

The government tried the B.C. Rail strategy:

“We’d love to talk about the medical firings but we wouldn’t want to compromise the ongoing R.C.M.P. investigation into the matter”

Oops, turns out there never was a police investigation.Strike that gambit.

They publicly admitted that “mistakes were made” and insisted “we’re taking steps to make sure this kind of thing will never happen again.”

Not good enough. No details, no documentation. No attempt to discuss the who, why, when, and how the firings took place.

Demands for a full public inquiry came from all quarters. The Vancouver Sun did a front-page editorial, insisting a full public inquiry was the only way to clarify what happened and to discover those responsible.

Columnists, pundits, talk radio hosts, and the Twittersphere joined the chorus crying for a public inquiry.

The government tried empathy. Minister Terry Lake insisted that they were just as tortured as was the public about this incident. He maintained they wanted to get out as much information as possible to the public, but they were just so concerned about protecting the reputations of those involved that they couldn’t decide on an efficacious process to do so. So difficult, so upsetting, we’re all suffering, they said.

They tried explaining how expensive, slow, and inconclusive public inquiries could be. They gave examples.

But even this was seen as subterfuge by an un-mollified, angry public.

The hordes are now at the gate. The rabble is screaming for answers. A full public inquiry seems inevitable.

Ah, but enter the solution – an Ombudsperson’s investigation.

The Ombudsperson’s Investigation is the government’s last chance to diffuse hysteria over what appears to the layman to be the petulant sacking of eight people the government didn’t like much.

An Ombudsperson’s investigation would give the government breathing room and control that a public inquiry wouldn’t afford.

An Ombudsperson’s Investigation would take months, even years.

It would be a private process until a report is filed, and while the investigation was going on we certainly wouldn’t want to compromise it by discussing  anything at all about the firings, would we?

It would buy the government time to find other shiny objects with which to distract the media and the public.

It would give people time to forget the whole thing, as they did B.C. Rail.

And it would give the government time to develop a scapegoat or two.

The government knows an Ombudsperson’s investigation isn’t good enough for the public and they have to be cagey as they proceed towards commissioning one.

The newly appointed Ombudsperson is demanding more powers if he is to undertake this investigation. The government seems to be balking at the suggestion. They aren’t sure it’s appropriate to change the Ombudsperson’s mandate. They appear resistant.

This dance of reticence has already been accepted by columnists as proof of the Ombudsperson’s independence, but it’s all show, feigning tough negotiation only to enhance the credibility of the exercise. The government wants to be dragged kicking and screaming into what they wanted all along – an Ombudsperson’s investigation. They’ll reluctantly accept the idea and blame its non result on those who pushed for it.

It’s Brer Rabbit psychology:

“Oh please, Brer Bear, do whatever you must just please, please don’t throw me into the briar patch…”

Ombudsperson Chalke is in an untenable position in regard to this proposed investigation.

He knows the whitewash the government wishes him to apply. He knows what will be said by the public if he applies it and what his future career might look if he doesn’t apply it. Look what happened to the last Ombudsperson the government didn’t like.

Yes man or hatchet man, he can’t win.

Even if Colonel Sanders is honest and forthcoming, any report he submits concerning the missing chickens will not be accepted by an angry public, a suspicious public, a public demanding answers, a public that has a sinking feeling they’ve been bamboozled once too often by this government’s prestidigitation.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Quietly Canadian

What I like best about Canada Day is what we don’t do to express patriotism.

We don’t cheerlead our country or engage in loud reverie, hundred gun salutes, or glorification of military endeavour.

We Canadians share a mature love of country that doesn’t need the re-assurance of cloyed fanfare or patriotic pomp. We express our patriotism quietly.

As usual, our family will make its patriotic statement by going to Port Moody City Hall for the Firefighters Golden Spike Days pancake breakfast. We’ll eat pancakes and sausages on a paper plate, among friends, neighbours, (and ex-students); drinking sketchy coffee and mingling.

The City Hall plaza won’t be plastered with Canadian flags. There will be no brass band playing “The Maple Leaf Forever”; no ceremony or speeches glorifying our troops or our freedom. We know all that. It will be calm, civilized, friendly, and maybe a bit cheesy; just like Canada.

Over pancakes the talk won’t be about Canada, but to its annual participants, this local Canada Day tradition is a stronger homage to country than fireworks and a fly past.

In the evening, we’ll watch C.B.C. show the Canada Day celebrations in Ottawa; a celebration of understated Canadian proportions – open air, apolitical, scrupulously balanced French, English, and First Nations content, and not too long.

When in Palm Springs (in my recent “snowbird” incarnation), I am repeatedly amazed at how deep Canadian patriotism is.

When, during happy hour, an American friend slips into discussing American politics, Canadians listen, and commiserate without engaging. Conservative or liberal, easterner or westerner, there is a shared, knowing glance; there’s no point arguing; Canadians have a different vision, with which we are quietly, almost smugly, comfortable.

This remote patriotism shows that love for Canada, though reserved, is deeply felt and unshakeable. The fact that Canadianism is so portable is a testament to its strength.

We tried hysterical flag-waving during the Vancouver Olympics; to the point that other countries started to bristle somewhat. Flag waving feels good, but it’s just not how we roll.

Canadian patriotism is like a sixty -year marriage; its real strength lies in tacit, respectful
sharing, seldom involving much overt, physical expression.Photo

This Canada Day, may we all appreciate what Canadians so strongly and quietly, share;

… and maybe have some pancakes.



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Taking Control Of Public Education in B.C.


“Taking control” of education has been the agenda of the B.C.Libs. since 2002’s contract stripping -the original sin.

The newly elected Liberal Government tasked Christy Clark, then Minister of Education to break what they saw as an unwarranted control of education by teachers. The government set out to right the wrong.

But somewhere in the process, the animus Ms. Clark holds for teachers and public schools turned personal and became overt.

Ms. Clark’s anger with teachers has long trumped any desire she may have had to fund healthy public schools.

War room strategy replaced planning for adequate support of healthy public schools.

And the Liberal government’s educational pogrom of the last 14 years has been as much a strategic political success for Ms. Clark as it has been an educational disaster.

Far from defending public schools,many parents responded to the continuous political unrest in public schools,  by bailing to private schools, which now house 12% of B.C.’s students.

So, now, what began in 2001 as a focussed vendetta to show teachers who’s boss, has morphed into a multi- faceted effort to accelerate the migration to private schools.

This year’s acrimonious teacher contact negotiations was a public education smack down success for the government.

They won. They gave public schools and teachers almost nothing, and they’ll recoup more than they gave with increased cuts.

They broke the teachers spirit.

One would think that  there might be some time for a little cuddling after such a  defiling.

But there has not even been time for a post coital cigarette for battle fatigued public educators.

If anything,the attacks on public education from government have increased, in order to keep the unrest up and encourage more parents to leave the chaos in our public schools.

$54 million in administrative cuts, appointing a VSB forensic auditor, and now, government scrutiny of Professional Development Days.

These actions are designed to imply that:

  • there’s still lots of extra money in school district budgets
  • local fiscal mismanagement is a big problem in public schools
  • Vancouver, a perennial cuts fighting district, is particularly poorly run
  • Pro D-days are not used wisely by teachers.

These are all strategically valuable aspersions to cast if your goal is to encourage B.C. parent’s to get away from the distemper of public schools and agree to pay half of their child’s education in private schools.

The privatization of education is now an obvious goal of the B.C. Government.

It’s significant that Christy Clark personally announced the appointment of a “Private Schools Advocate” recently.

Having personally taken control of education over fourteen years, she’s spiking the ball.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Stop Glorifying Violence

Can’t we stop giving so much attention to criminals and terrorists?

Fifteen minutes of fame is one thing, but the insatiable appetite of the media to   chronicle the life stories of those who kill or blow up people is troubling.

24 hour media feeding frenzies bestow rock star status on the disturbed among us, and give angry lone wolves macabre glorification when they act out their violent tendencies.

And worse, the more violent and senseless the action, the more attention the perpetrator gets and the deeper we cower in our beds after each, ensuing media circus.

Perhaps it’s just that now have we the digital capacity to thus immerse ourselves in tragedies, or maybe it’s a government conspiracy to keep the population afraid and acceptant of wealth disparity or Draconian government initiatives.

Either way, it’s frightening, and we seem to be encouraging violence with our inordinate preoccupation with it.

Our media should treat the actions of extremists and disturbed lone wolves with the disrespect they deserve. If we insist that the western world is under attack every time a deranged person does something, we risk encouraging that which we decry.

Report the act, but not the person. Indicate that the appropriate authorities are taking action and describe the positive manner in which the majority of the citizenry is behaving and move on.

In a younger life, as a school Principal , I quickly learned that one doesn’t discourage poor behaviour by predicting disaster when troubled students act out.

“I ‘d like to say that to whomever painted “Mr. Nelson is a jerk” on the back of the school that spray bombing buildings is an anti social and disrespectful act…”

Really? Is this information a spray bomber requires? Why do you think he did it in the first place?

Don’t respond. Say nothing. Smile and have the graffiti removed immediately. Act as if it’s inconsequential. Find out who’s responsible and reluctantly suspend them from school until there is an agreement about his paying for and repainting the wall, preferably when there are a few kids around to see him painting.

The power of depriving miscreants of attention combined with a cheerful stiff upper lip that things are generally positive can’t be under estimated.

I hear you cry, “ but surely graffiti and acts of extreme violence and murder can’t be equated.”

Perhaps, but here’s another example of how to “extinguish” behaviour.

When was the last time you saw a “streaker” at a televised sports event?

We had no idea how to respond to drunken naked tossers who cheerfully disturbed the big game. We laughed a bit, talked about the perpetrator and then, as streaking became common, we got angry and preached about getting tough. Surprise, streaking became even more common- a fad, and we were worried about how to make them stop.

Streaking high profile events became pervasive enough that we were motivated to figure out how to discourage it. News outlets unanimously stopped giving streakers any media attention.

Suddenly, streakers weren’t televised or talked about. The camera moved to an announcer, who parenthetically mentioned that “some idiot” was responsible for a game delay and then quickly went on to consult a commentator about the game.

It worked. Immediately. No fifteen minutes of fame. Bored indifference shown by everyone. No more streakers.No glory, no fun, no attention. Anger didn’t work.Fear didn’t work. Removing all attention from the act however,worked spectacularly well.

A similar strategy has been successfully used in Metro Vancouver school gang policing strategy.

In the 80’s,local tweeners began donning LA Raiders or Chicago Bulls sports uniforms, with matching bandanas, hood ornaments on a chain around their necks, and a half bottle of Drakkar Noir cologne liberally sprinkled over everything they owned.

Schools responded by asking police about their possible “gang affiliation” and were rewarded with organizational charts of “Los Diablos”, “Red Eagle”, and “Lotus” gangs, their colours, their practices.

For a year or two, anything that happened in schools was attributed to these uniformed tweener “gang members”.

Oozing rapport,we tried to urge them out of dressing that way. Some schools banned “colours”. We tried school liason officers that would interact with kids and talk them out of their imminent graduation to hard-core gang membership. Kids responded by buying an extra kerchief and splashing on some extra cologne.

Finally, we became resigned to the idea that we couldn’t fight conformity and we stopped talking about colours and “gangs”.

Local police also stopped calling young kids “gang members” or  “wannabees” and just dealt with the disturbed among them as “active youth” instead of giving them the lofty status of “gangbanger”.

Surprise. As quickly as it started, the gang wannabee thing faded. No one got angry at them any more. No attention, no fun – and that cologne really did smell awful.

Kids migrated to blue hair, Mohawk haircuts, and piercings to announce their individuality and we got on with life sans “gangs.”

The above are low level anti social behaviours that were effectively extinguished by denying attention to bad actors.

Clearly, radical terrorism and lone wolf violence won’t just stop if we simply ignore it and hope it goes away. There are long held cultural, religious, and political beliefs that spawn real violence. These are not children or drunken sports fans we’re dealing with so of course it’s not that simple.

I’m also not suggesting that we shouldn’t attempt to address and improve the hopeless and helpless situations that can make people violently strike out.

But I am convinced that an effective first step in the “war on terror” (after dropping the name “war on terror”), would be a media moratorium on unearthing and analyzing myriad gory details of horrific crimes and cradle to grave exposés of every moment of every criminal’s disturbing life.

Infamy is a gift we give too eagerly, too often and to too many.

As long as we continue to make people famous for blowing up or killing people, more people will be moved to blow up or kill people.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Stop Calling it Assisted Suicide – It’s Been Medical Practice for Years

While the recent judgement of the Supreme Court to allow doctor assisted dying  is gratifyingly forward looking and sensible, it really doesn’t change much for Canada’s terminally ill or those in severe, chronic, pain.

For years, hospitals and doctors, in consultation with patients and family, have negotiated “do not resuscitate” orders for seriously ill patients. In addition, “comfort care” is a euphemism for aggressively mitigating pain to the point that comfortable death replaces therapeutic care as the goal of treatment.

Doctors, families and terminally ill patients have been quietly  making these decisions for years. It ‘s a compassionate and appropriate practice.

My family experienced “comfort care” when a family member, whose pain was considerable and whose prognosis was bleak, died a comfortable, medically expedited death, through the cessation of therapeutic medication and a significant increase in pain medication.

A very sensitive doctor invited us in to discuss possible treatment options. Our family member faced the prospect of a feeding tube, virtual immobility, and because her heart was healthy, a long, slow, uncomfortable death. It was a no brainer. Her pain medication was upped and she died peacefully two days later. She was ready.

I know how I would have responded had an officious politicians who didn’t know our loved one or her medical condition, tried to prohibit her humane death on the basis of religious dogma or a trumped up thin edge of the wedge argument.

It always seems that those who purport to want “small government” are the loudest voices encouraging the government to legislate people’s moral and  medical behaviour.

No law could know what was best for our loved one in her dying days. No law could presume to be helpful in sorting out the end of life medical circumstances of individual Canadians. The right law is no law  for families and loved ones dealing with prolonged uncomfortable death.

And can we stop calling medically expedited death “assisted Suicide”? It’s such an unnecessarily incendiary term. “Assisted suicide” conjures up an image of third parties preparing nooses, loading the 45, or casing out the Patullo Bridge for grandma’s imminent swan dive. That is not what happens today and it’s not what this Supreme Court ruling suggests.

I’m proud to be a Canadian today. The unanimous decision of the Court to support people’s right to choose doctor assisted death over long, painful palliative care or hospice, is the latest in a series of actions that affirm both the common sense and efficacy of the Canadian social conscience.

The overreaction to the decision is weak and won’t fly. Canadians are a socially sensible and compassionate lot, and the argument that this ruling is the thin edge of the wedge, that before long we’ll be offing grandma the first time she loses her car keys will be seen for how ludicrous it is.

Single payer health care unanimously accepted.A woman’s right to choose firmly embraced. Recently, marriage equality legislated with no fuss, and now, the unanimous acceptance of allowing the chronically ill, their families, and their doctor to make dying with dignity decisions at the end of life.

Bravo Canada.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

“The Sky Is Falling”

The Sky is Falling!

Watching U.S. President Obama’s State of the Union speech recently, I was struck by how many “sky is falling” predictions made by adversaries over the years have been ridiculed by time.

Gas prices didn’t go through the roof, the unemployment rate didn’t worsen, the country didn’t collapse and Shariah law didn’t take over the U.S. judiciary.

Though ridiculous in hindsight, such ideas had their moments of popularity, and some, purveyed by 24 hour news cycles and relentless social media still enjoy a significant following in the U.S.

The power of our media is growing exponentially and some media mantras endure, despite all evidence to the contrary.

One in four Americans believes Barak Obama was not born in the U.S. and that climate change is not made worse by human activity.

One in four Americans believe God will decide who wins the Super Bowl, and one in three Texans believe humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth at the same time.

We can convince anyone of anything regardless of whether there is a shred of truth in the idea.

And as we careen from tecnological advancement to techonological advancement we become increasingly susceptible to sound bites and simple, pithy messages, many of 140 characters or fewer.

It’s not a conspiracy, but it is frightening.

We’re kept in a constant state of anxiety over things, many of which are proven over time to be not worth getting lathered over.

And it’s not just Americans who are afraid, and led around by zealots, slacktivists and an hysterical media.

Here’s some Canadian examples of womped up mortal fears which didn’t quite pan out.

 Y2K Scare.

As we approached the year 2000 we were told that world data systems would collapse. Computers wouldn’t move from 1999 to 2000 and analogue data would somehow be likewise overwhelmed.

People began hoarding water and emergency supplies in preparation for the millennium cataclysm.

It turned out to be a Maple Leaf power play – quite the fizzle.

The Canadian flag

The flag of which Canadians are now so proud, was going to ruin the country if they “shoved it down our throats.”

People said it would never replace the red ensign. Ex- patriots and Brits screamed (yes screamed) that Canada’s rich heritage was being thrown under the bus and that if we adopted the Maple Leaf flag, Canada as we know it would be gone forever.

Once the decision was made many said they would refuse to recognize the new flag. People who had never flown a flag before pledged to now fly the red ensign on their houses forever.

Quite the overblown brouhaha.

Health Care

When Canada followed Tommy Douglases Saskatchewan and adopted medicare, the outcry was deafening.( for Canada)

It was a socialist plot. it will destroy our freedom and everything we hold dear. Doctors will never accept it. People will go to the doctor on a whim, whenever they have a hangnail, and we will quadruple health care costs.

Overblown, relentless , Chicken Little hysteria.

(The Americans have added “death panels” and other abhorences to the opprobrium over Obamacare.)

Land Commision Act ( 1970’s B.C.)

The Land Commission Act, for the first time designated B.C. land for farm, industrial, recreational or residential use. After years of the benevolent dictatorship of Bennett the first, B.C. was far behind the rest of the country in such innocuous, sensible regulation.

At the time however, it was as if there was a communist takeover in the offing. There was a media supported, McCarthyist response from Socreds and influential talk show hosts.

(Premier) Dave Barrett was a communist, who would take our land from us. Editorial cartoons featuring all manner of commissar and Kremlin jokes abounded. B.C.’S Land Commission Act prompted the biggest red scare hysteria in living memory – and that’s saying something in B.C.

Headlines in the Vancouver Sun quoted a Social credit zealot admonishing,

“When the Red tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia, we didn’t hear any N.D.P. protests” !

The Land Commision Act is now a law no B.C. government would dare repeal or replace. And surprisingly to some, time has shown that B.C. didn’t turn into a Russian satellite nor were we all required to wear red underwear – two of the sillier suggestions of the day.

The melodramatic, overblown red baiting over the Land Commission Act was an early portent of the now rampant rhetorical pogroms we unleash on even the most sensible initiative.

Things like…

Bike lanes, oil pipelines, avoiding oil spills, funding education,addressing poverty, and myriad other initiatives so heaped with fear and hyperbole that normal folk can’t resist the rhetorical barrage.

On issue after issue, our perceptions are formed by hysterical media carpet-bombing, with internet feeds and social media evangelizing the message instantly.

We can convince millions of anything in hours. We needn’t do our own research,fact check, or break a sweat analyzing things.

We can destroy reputations in hours, lose a career through a single mistake, promote or destroy causes with re –tweeted oversimplifications.

Marshal McLuhan is spinning in his grave. His theme, “the media is the message” has become an understatement.

So when the carpet bombing hysteria starts and people insist that we’re doomed if we allow “X” to happen, take a pill – it’s OK. When spending more on education would collapse the economy or when we’re all hippies and fiscal fools for considering the environment before supporting strip mining and drilling everything in sight, relax – take it with a grain of salt, because hindsight usually makes fools of the hysterical Chicken Little’s.



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why Do We Hate the B.C.T.F.?


Mention a salary increase for teachers and you’d think a bunch of greedy moneygrubbers were forcing Scrooge McDuck to open his money bin for ransacking.

The public doesn’t get angry with the BCGEU, or CUPE or nurses, at contract time or any other time, regardless of how spirited contract negotiations become.

So why do we spew anger, almost hatred, for the “B.C.T.F.” when teacher contracts come up?

Firefighters and police quietly negotiate contracts that beat the cost of living without much fanfare each year. Regardless of the size of the salary increase, we accept it without ado.

We never feel the need to tell firefighters that the public is their boss. We don’t feel the public purse threatened when nurses ask for a raise.

Why does discussion of teacher’s job and working conditions make us respond so viscerally, so angrily, as if someone had let the words “ fast ferries” slip?

Under normal circumstances, one would think teachers had a fairly good case this time.

They had taken an extra “0” compared with other public sector workers. Statistics showed a clear erosion of both teacher’s salaries and funding for education.

And they had two court rulings instructing the government to restore language and funding stripped from education in 2002 and fining them for not bargaining in good faith.

They had a strong case, one would think they would have enjoyed significant public support in their negotiations.

But the teachers case didn’t make it to the consciousness of most British Columbians.

Tired of seemingly endless squabbles between teachers and government, many chose to vilify teachers, or at least the “B.C.T.F.” which has become the whipping boy in the dispute.



It’s All About Aggregate Experience

People judge groups of people based on the aggregate of their experiences with that group

Who hates firefighters, their union, or anything about them? No one. You’d be crazy to.

We know some firefighters were accused of treating female recruits badly. Many moonlight at other jobs, and some drink too much and go to strip clubs. But this anecdotal information is water off a duck’s back to us, as it should be.

Such anecdotes don’t bother us because our aggregate experience with firefighters though limited is positive. They put out fires, wear uniforms, collect money for muscular dystrophy and attend community events being helpful and friendly or flipping pancakes at pancake breakfasts.

Our aggregate experience with firefighters outweighs any “bad” things we may hear about individual firefighters. We thus accept that they know their job and are doing it. So when Delta firefighters get an eye-opening raise, we say – OK, they deserve it.

And firefighter performance is easily measured. Building on fire, fire out; – success. Cat in tree; cat out – ah job done. Community activity; firefighters present – good.

The point is not that firefighters don’t deserve public appreciation, or salary increases, they certainly do. The point is that the occupation is impossible to criticize; not because all firefighters are wonderful but because our aggregate experience with them is unavoidably and overwhelmingly positive.

The same is true of police. Their performance is easily measurable; bad guy caught, in slammer – job done. There is occasional criticism of police being over zealous or bullying, but the aggregate of our experience with police is that they risk their lives and help keep us safe. Negative anecdotes about cops don’t outweigh our positive aggregate experiences.

Nurses nurture. My Dad had a wonderful nurse, we liked good old nurse what’s her name when my wife gave birth. Illness cured – job done, easily measured, they deserve a raise. Don’t know much about what the job entails but I give it an 8 – I like the beat.

On the other side of the coin, we don’t like lawyers because our aggregate experience with them is negative. We often don’t know what lawyers are talking about – they talk in language with which we are not quite familiar and often make us feel inadequate.

Lawyers seem to make piles of money for doing even the smallest thing, which we suspect their secretaries actually do for them in five minutes.

So any negative anecdotes we hear about lawyers aren’t overlooked but rather are accepted, intensifying our already jaded view of them.

I realize this is an extremely simple and unfair characterization of lawyers, but people’s low opinion of lawyers, right or wrong, is based on their aggregate experience with them regardless of how limited that experience is.

So what about teachers?

Those who work in schools generally have a positive aggregate of experience with schools. They have seen enough of the positive things that go on in schools. This allows them to discount anecdotal school horror stories as anomalies rather than rule.

But what is most people’s aggregate experience with teachers?

First, we all went school for 13 years so we all know all about school and teachers. We all had difficulties, and we remember the crabby teacher(s) who were bossy, or embarrassed us. Teachers corrected us, often ineffectively. We were young and our perceptions were intense, magnified by youthful insecurities.

We left school with some residual resentment, and we went about our business, got a taste of a competitive world. Our aggregate perceptions of school and teachers were those of a child transferred to our adult minds.

Then we had our own children and they went to school, and don’t you know, they had similar difficulties in school, sometimes coming home in tears, experiencing an intransigent teacher who seemed to make little attempt to appreciate that special thing about our child. Our hearts bled for our child and our almost forgotten frustrations bubble up.

As parents, when we did go to our child’s school, we saw some teachers yell at kids. We saw rules and subjugation, just like we experienced.

And we saw other children behaving badly and seemingly not being disciplined.

We saw meaningless reams of homework, we saw our child excluded from a group or activity and felt our expressed concerns glossed over.

The only time we heard from the school was when our child was in trouble. We often felt our parenting was being questioned and that we were supposed to fix a problem that it seemed to us wasn’t our child’s fault.

As parents. we saw needy children that couldn’t read or write, even by high school, and we couldn’t help feeling that school is less rigorous that it was when we were in school, not realizing that when we were in school there were likely just as many non readers as there are now, we were just too young and self consumed to notice.

We bore these frustrations, hoping that our child would benefit from the overall experience of school.

So when contractual bickering continued year after year, our aggregate experience with teachers left many of us predisposed to reject teacher’s demands.

And with all that, apparently success in teaching and learning can’t be accurately measured. We saw teachers continually resist standardized accountability measures. This was frustrating, especially when we remembered some of our teachers who we thought sub standard and yet seem to enjoy invulnerable tenure.

We saw teachers go on strike no matter who the government was.

There seemed no way of getting rid of ineffective teachers and we blamed the union for protecting them and insisting they get a raise.

In short, most of us haven’t had enough positive experiences with schools and teachers to overwhelm our personal experiences and anecdotal stories about them.

Once our negative experiences with a group outweigh our positive experiences, we add each negative remark to the quiver of arrows we shoot at them; in line at the supermarket or online on Twitter.

If our aggregate experience with teachers is negative, why is it that the “B.C.T.F.” get almost all the criticism and anger rather than “teachers”? After all they represent teachers don’t they? Why do we hurl invectives at the “B.C.T.F.” rather than at “teachers”?

Again, it’s aggregate experience. Although our aggregate experience with teachers may be negative, our perceptions have all been somewhat inoculated. We all know hard working and caring teachers who are difficult to criticize.

But our aggregate experience with the B.C.T.F. the negotiating arm of the teachers,is and can be totally negative. So we vilify the scapegoat B.C.T.F. without having to criticize individual teachers.

We get angry that the “B.C.T.F.” perennially disagrees with almost everything their employer offers and their negotiations with government always end in back to work legislation or job action. We hate that they always seem to complain about underfunding and working conditions, year after year.

We hear from the media about how “militant” the B.C.T.F. is, how they can’t negotiate with any government and how they don’t like resource development or BC Liberals, and how they use children as pawns for their own greedy purposes.

We absorb each negative slight heaped on the “B.C.T.F.” because our aggregate experience with schools is not positive enough to allow us to analyze criticisms through a prism of respect as we might for a firefighter, nurse, or cop.

And we can focus our anger on the B.C.T.F. without having to hate good old Mrs. Switz at the local school, who we know to be kind, caring and hard working.

Government representatives speak rhapsodically about teachers and harshly about the unreasonable B.C.T.F., simultaneously providing a scapegoat for B.C.’s education woes and deflecting attention from demonstrable education underfunding and Supreme Court censure.

The media, who have long ago forgotten about bargaining issues, find it easier and more sexy to pile on the B.C.T.F., the lightning rod for our frustration with the discord in our education system.

And so now the vilification of the B.C.T.F is a universal sport. Educational issues are forgotten and instead, we spend our time discussing the shortcomings of the B.C.T.F., it’s leaders and its strategies.

Even some teachers, all of whom know the system has been serially and dangerously underfunded, have been unable to stay off the B.C.T.F, bashing bandwagon in a futile attempt to stem the tide of public anger towards teachers.

Why are we so angry with the B.C.T.F.?

We are slaves to our aggregate experience.

And we mistakenly think our aggregate experience with schools, born of personal youthful memories and snippets of stressful times in our child’s development, are sufficient data for us to effectively judge the efficacy of teachers and schools.












Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

F.S.A. is Political Football But Education is Rugby


AS I SEE IT – Jim Nelson

So the annual hand wringing over the Foundation Skills Assessments tests begins again: Why are teachers so dead against them? Is it just that awful B.C.T.F. being radical again?

Should we keep our children from writing the tests?

The trouble with the FSA is not the tests but how they are used. F.S.A. exams are the B.C. banner of the accountability movement in education, a movement that has ruined American public schools over the last 20 years and yet is catching on in B.C. despite its disastrous effect on U.S. schools.

The accountability movement started in the U.S. and was borne of the American tendency to analyze, regulate and measure things. A good example of this is the development of American football.

Now, I enjoy an NFL game as much as much as the next person but a look at American football’s metamorphosis from rugby is instructive in understanding the development of the accountability movement in education.

Americans didn’t play rugby for long; rather, they quickly felt the compulsion to regulate and delineate the heck out of it. They divided the field into one-yard segments with 200 hash marks, added five officials, helmets and padding, statistics, instant replay, score clocks and down chains. They broke the game into quarters. Time-outs, huddles, motion rules, penalties — with designated yards for designated offences — all marched off precisely. There are signals for everything, a ritualized kicking game and 300-page playbooks with X’s and O’s and arrows.

Instead of rugby, with one ball, one referee, an emphasis on spontaneity and creativity, and an almost chivalrous adherence to fair play, our southern cousins ended up with football, a testament to rules, measures, specialization and intervention.

Unfortunately, the same cultural compulsion that spawned American football proved unhelpful when applied to education because education is like rugby. It is interactive, free-flowing, spontaneous and creative, rather than easily quantifiable, pre-packaged and measured. It is too complex to be judged by a standardized measure, no matter how strong the cultural imperative may be to do so.

How can a standardized test measure the “A-ha!” moment when a student suddenly appreciates the brilliance of Shakespeare? How can it measure the ability to co-operate or persevere or to help another student?

Learning takes place through relationships with peers and teachers. It can only be measured somewhat accurately using an aggregation of many and varied assessments, both objective and anecdotal.

We all wish it was simpler, that we could judge how students are doing with a simple urine sample or a multiple-guess test.

My opinion, although I’m a bit radical, is that an even more accurate indication of how well your child is learning is whether they are happy at school, whether they feel safe, are confident and engaged at school. If they “like” the teacher, have friends, feel good about their studies and enjoy school, they are learning just fine.

The B.C.T.F. is dead right on this issue. Although the union brings up red herrings such as how the poor children suffer undue stress when asked to write tests or how the poor teachers have to mark them, or the time it takes out of the curriculum or that the reason they are no good is because of demographic differences, yada yada yada, these are peripheral reasons for objecting to the FSA.

Teachers and the B.C.T.F. know viscerally that trying to legitimize standardized measures is harmful to our schools and, thus, our children’s learning. They are the only ones standing against the accountability movement.

As a former school principal in the Tri-Cities, I applaud this stance. Were my children in Grade 7, I would encourage them to not write the F.S.A. exams. Had I a child in Grade 4, I would send him to school and quietly but firmly instruct the school that he is not to write the F.S.A. exams and that perhaps half an hour in the gymnasium or on the playing field might be a good alternative.

Jim Nelson is a retired Tri-City teacher and principal.


Following is “Turfin’ FSA,” sung to the tune of the Beach Boys’ “Surfin’ U.S.A.-by Jim Nelson and Dennis Secret:

Turfin’ F.S.A

If everybody had a notion, ’round District 43,

We’d call BS on the testing and we’d go on a spree,

We’ll throw ‘em all in the dumpster, autonomy has its day,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

We’re giving testing the boot,

’Cause it just don’t compute.

And then we’ll set our sights on, the Fraser Institute.

Every district in B.C. will see us leadin’ the way,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Not Your Parents Anti -Education Crowd

There have always been those who have spent their adult lives disliking teachers and public schools. It’s understandable. Traditionally, most dissatisfaction with schools and teachers was born of personal experiences, or experiences of their children, and from anecdotal horror stories.

But not any more; there’s a new constituency of anti public education bloggers inhabiting the Twittersphere.

These are the educational libertarians. (this is my term, not theirs)

Educational Libertarians feel that public education is an irresistible force, usurping their rights as parents to bring up their children as they see fit. They feel the education system seeks to bring up their children for them and is unresponsive to parent’s wishes.

They feel threatened by an educational fraternity that they see as constantly working to strengthen their empire and their grip over kids, parents and family.

Educational libertarians believe that education should be offered like any other competitive service. Parents should be free to either accept or reject the service.

The compulsory, universal mandate of public education for all frustrates libertarians. They see the system as one which shackles children and them as parents.

Educational Libertarians see public education as shady and power hungry, in the same way Eisenhower saw the military industrial complex.

They see teachers as resistant to accountability. Educational libertarians do not accept that teachers and schools cannot be rated like other occupations. The fact that it’s difficult to “fire” poor teachers is unacceptable to them.

Libertarians argue that teaching is not a profession for this reason- teachers are not accountable because their service can’t be refused and they can’t be fired therefore, they are not professionals.

Educational libertarians feel parents should be the primary educators of their children. They believe they know their children best and are thus best qualified to decide how their children are educated.

They feel extreme frustration that parents, the employers of a huge, lifetime tenured, unresponsive and patronizing group of employees are ignored, even ridiculed should they rage against the machine.

Educational libertarians hold their beliefs very strongly. Those with whom I converse regularly are not just whimsically opposed to teachers and public schools for no reason – they’re committed.

Many educational libertarians research and read voraciously to inform and exposit their frustration and anger with the education machine.

Their beliefs are only strengthened by the usual discourse about education and schools and they are invulnerable to contrary argument, because they see it as coming from the education behemoth itself.

Anecdotal information about how hard teacher’s work, how committed they are to children or how much they contribute to our kids and society only hardens their views.

Decrying standardized testing is teachers fighting against the accountability with which everyone else has to deal.

Talking about child development, or executive function as important school contributions, or other discussions about educational issues are pointless until one addresses the basic belief; that the system is working against children, parents, and family.

The analyses above are just conclusions I have drawn from my considerable online interactions since the teacher’s strike, with many, very well spoken, if angry bloggers.

My reason for presuming to speak for educational libertarians however (which I know I’ll hear about online), is not to refute their beliefs but only to identify them.

Personally, I have learned much from discussions with even the most argumentative educational libertarians. I have finally put some meat on the bones of the anti teacher, anti public school sentiment so prevalent today.

I share some of the concerns they express, especially those about the need for the education system to  respond and change more nimbly.

During the strike, I thought the rampant teacher bashing we engaged in was just a bunch of people who had a bad school experience or whose child had a clumsy or even lousy teacher.

I now know better.

Some of it was that, but much of it was much more than that – born of  a new, stronger, educational libertarianism that is not going away.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Boy, I’ve Had Some Lousy Teachers

I’ve had some lousy teachers –some really lousy teachers, who did some spectacularly unhelpful things.

One scared the heck out me; I cowered for the entire term. She yelled, and hit kids with a pointer. I “did my work” and got straight “A’s”, for fear of physical punishment. All the lessons I learned that year were about fear.

Some teachers I had were not very bright; in fact, I think I was smarter than some of them. I often suffered through deadly dull classes and meaningless busy work. I often felt bossed around, punished needlessly, and unfairly treated. I felt that many teachers didn’t understand me and made no attempt to. I saw silly, unnecessary rules and punishments.

Teachers gave me  Herculean worksheets and made me try to learn numbingly boring things in which I had no interest.I wrote  thousands of “lines”, and attended more detentions than I care to remember.

We had to recite the Lord’s Prayer daily and listen to a ten-minute Bible reading every morning until grade 6.

I was strapped for playing tetherball at the wrong time and again for climbing a horse chestnut tree that was out of bounds.

In elementary school, a teacher gave us  fifteen pages of math word problems to do over Christmas vacation.

In Grade 10 I refused to write the Roman numerals from one to ten thousand as a punishment for something inconsequential I’d done. I fought the “sentence” and lost, even though the teacher was insensitive and crabby. (and wrong)

I had ridiculous assignments and worksheet teachers and I ran afoul of the main office several times for breaking silly rules – no eating lunch in the hallways, no basketball shooting for the first half of lunch hour, no painting the Principal’s headlights black at the school dance. (well perhaps that rule made a bit of sense.)

I had a high school Principal so clumsy and ineffective with people that many of us could hardly remain civil towards him. Insecure, arbitrary and irascible, he reminded me of the awful Macy’s psychologist in “Miracle on 34th Street,” who tried to get Kris Kringle fired as Macy’s store Santa. (hence the black headlights)

If my adult impressions of public school were based solely on these memories I would likely have joined the cadre of anti education tweeting trolls on the internet.

Yes , I had some lousy teachers, and yet, I still became a teacher and a fierce supporter of public schools. Why?

Because in addition to the bad experiences I list above, there were myriad good things and some inspiring teachers and friends of all colours, abilities, and proclivities. School afforded me 13 years of rich self-actualization, in the company of hundreds of kids my own age – school was a petrie dish of child development.

School gave me a place to be my own person, away from my Mom and Dad.

That is not to criticize my parents, they were great. They were smart enough to know that school helps kids practice values instilled at home; that schools despite their warts, complemented their parenting rather than usurping or competing with it.

They also knew that teachers had a more fleeting emotional relationship with children that gave them a more objective credibility than a parent. Handled artfully, the triangle of school, parent, child, helps the child and the parent, who can step back and be supportive of their child’s progress at school, rather than having to helicopter over every moment of their child’s development.

Despite and between the malpractices I list above, school and teachers allowed me to experience and experiment with activities, friendships and relationships that allowed me to develop as more than an appendage of my parents.

In school I learned where I stood with other people. I could practice and develop strategies for getting along with smart kids, dumb kids, athletic kids, funny kids, studious kids, – the cultural mosaic of kids who came to public schools to learn the same lessons I did.

As a retired teacher and Principal, I am now wise about schools in a way I wasn’t before and I’ve concluded that the real benefits of public school are the un- measurable ones, the child development ones.

I now realize that teaching “stuff” to kids is only a minor benefit of public schools. The different kinds of clouds, square root, the line of British monarchs, these are just the vehicles we use as we help children enter and come to grips with, the next stage of their development as people.

I have often said that I learned as much at school as I did in school.

My schools were close by. We could walk or ride a bike to and from school with neighbourhood friends we gathered along the way.

Walking to and from school with a couple of friends every day is a more valuable learning experience than social studies class.

And so is unstructured playtime. Before and after school touch football games, ball hockey and other pick up games spawned at school. Kids make up their own rules and are often so intensely involved they have to be asked two or three times to come in from lunch hour.

As a Principal, I often wanted to let them play rather than calling them in to Math class.

Assuredly, none of the things I describe above that happened to me in school should happen in any school; but then, my perceptions come from my memories as a child. I can’t consider them from the perspective of the adults who had to deal with my admittedly precocious behaviour.

But more important, it’s not helpful to form one’s opinions about public schools based on a small sample of traumatic childhood memories, either your own or your child’s. The childhood monsters we saw in the closet should look different viewed through adult eyes.

We should look beyond anecdotal childhood memories of things that happen(ed) in schools and appreciate and nurture the irreplaceable, developmental lessons our children learn from parent and public school.

So yes, I had some lousy teachers. We all did.

But no matter how bad the teacher or how good the parent, the invaluable developmental cocoon offered by neighbourhood public schools can’t be replicated; in even the most sensitive and attentive of homes, or in cross town, uniformed learning academies with rigour and high standards.

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

Right On Andy…

– Andy Hargeaves, a proponent of Finnish public education methods and arguably one of Canada’s leading education commentators, succinctly sums up what has been happening in the U.S. and Canada in school reform.

“Following the lead of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, and before them, Augusto Pinochet of Chile, [the school reform movement] set about centralizing more of the curriculum and introducing more testing to hold teachers accountable,” Dr. Hargreaves wrote in an e-mail.

“It provided a new generation of consumer-oriented parents with information about the performance of schools, and published rankings of schools to stimulate market competition between them. Instead of measuring what we value, we have got stuck in valuing what we can easily measure.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

48 Remembrance Day Assemblies

Those who think public school’s most important function is to impart information need to look a little deeper into what schools teach kid, culture and  country.

Remembrance Day assemblies teach Canadian children how to observe Remembrance Day.

They did it well for me – 48 times.

After each of these 48 occasions, I came away with a sense of pride, in the contribution of our Canadian soldiers, but also in the appropriate respect with which our young people have learned to  treat this day.

Some assemblies were a bit melodramatic, some a bit schmaltzy, some a bit maudlin, and some (especially in High Schools) missed the Remembrance theme among anti-war songs and sentiment. (Ten minutes of “Where Have All the Flowers Gone” and “Imagine” by John Lennon can do that)

But in all 48 Remembrance Day assemblies I watched or organized, teachers and students showed such earnest respect for the occasion that it often reduced me to tears.

Kids knew to be solemn.  In fact,they often tried to out solemn each other as kids will. They knew to listen and to reflect on the hardships faced by other Canadians and to appreciate the horror of war. Those school kids were and will continue to be the architects  of Remembrance Day and how Canadians observe it.

48 assemblies, even with their occasional hiccups, were  appropriate, because their imperfections showed  they were organized by amateurs –heartrending, earnest, amateurs.

Sure there was always little Bobby, who couldn’t sit still during the minute silence and looked around trying to bring attention to himself, but he’d learn better – he’d have to, as he annually faced the unanimous respect with which his classmates observe the day.

The hundreds of children who set up the chairs, participated, organized, and recited “In Flanders Fields” in those 48 assemblies are all grown up now, many with children of their own.

And just as each of them learned about the culture of Remembrance Day in school assemblies, so will their children. They will continue to observe Remembrance Day in the Canadian tradition of quiet, solemn respect tempered by a healthy disdain for war.

Canadians do Remembrance Day right, and we learn how in assemblies in our public schools.

It’s a culturally crucial  contribution.





Posted in B.C. Politics, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

F.S.A. Is Political Football But Education is Rugby


AS I SEE IT    –  Jim Nelson

So the annual hand wringing over the Foundation Skills Assessments tests begins again: Why are teachers so dead against them? Is it just that awful B.C.T.F. being radical again?

Should we keep our children from writing the tests?

The trouble with the FSA is not the tests but how they are used. F.S.A. exams are the B.C. banner of the accountability movement in education, a movement that has ruined American public schools over the last 20 years and yet is catching on in B.C. despite its disastrous effect on U.S. schools.

The accountability movement started in the U.S. and was borne of the American tendency to analyze, regulate and measure things. A good example of this is the development of American football.

Now, I enjoy an NFL game as much as much as the next person but a look at American football’s metamorphosis from rugby is instructive in understanding the development of the accountability movement in education.

Americans didn’t play rugby for long; rather, they quickly felt the compulsion to regulate and delineate the heck out of it. They divided the field into one-yard segments with 200 hash marks, added five officials, helmets and padding, statistics, instant replay, score clocks and down chains. They broke the game into quarters. Time-outs, huddles, motion rules, penalties — with designated yards for designated offences — all marched off precisely. There are signals for everything, a ritualized kicking game and 300-page playbooks with X’s and O’s and arrows.

Instead of rugby, with one ball, one referee, an emphasis on spontaneity and creativity, and an almost chivalrous adherence to fair play, our southern cousins ended up with football, a testament to rules, measures, specialization and intervention.

Unfortunately, the same cultural compulsion that spawned American football proved unhelpful when applied to education because education is like rugby. It is interactive, free-flowing, spontaneous and creative, rather than easily quantifiable, pre-packaged and measured. It is too complex to be judged by a standardized measure, no matter how strong the cultural imperative may be to do so.

How can a standardized test measure the “A-ha!” moment when a student suddenly appreciates the brilliance of Shakespeare? How can it measure the ability to co-operate or persevere or to help another student?

Learning takes place through relationships with peers and teachers. It can only be measured somewhat accurately using an aggregation of many and varied assessments, both objective and anecdotal.

We all wish it was simpler, that we could judge how students are doing with a simple urine sample or a multiple-guess test.

My opinion, although I’m a bit radical, is that an even more accurate indication of how well your child is learning is whether they are happy at school, whether they feel safe, are confident and engaged at school. If they “like” the teacher, have friends, feel good about their studies and enjoy school, they are learning just fine.

The B.C.T.F. is dead right on this issue. Although the union brings up red herrings such as how the poor children suffer undue stress when asked to write tests or how the poor teachers have to mark them, or the time it takes out of the curriculum or that the reason they are no good is because of demographic differences, yada yada yada, these are peripheral reasons for objecting to the FSA.

Teachers and the B.C.T.F. know viscerally that trying to legitimize standardized measures is harmful to our schools and, thus, our children’s learning. They are the only ones standing against the accountability movement.

As a former school principal in the Tri-Cities, I applaud this stance. Were my children in Grade 7, I would encourage them to not write the F.S.A. exams. Had I a child in Grade 4, I would send him to school and quietly but firmly instruct the school that he is not to write the F.S.A. exams and that perhaps half an hour in the gymnasium or on the playing field might be a good alternative.

Jim Nelson is a retired Tri-City teacher and principal.



Following is “Turfin’ FSA,” sung to the tune of the Beach Boys’ “Surfin’ U.S.A.-by Jim Nelson and Dennis Secret:

Turfin’    F.S.A

If everybody had a notion, ’round District 43,

We’d call BS on the testing and we’d go on a spree,

We’ll throw ‘em all in the dumpster, autonomy has its day,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

We’re giving testing the boot,

’Cause it just don’t compute.

And then we’ll set our sights on, the Fraser Institute.

Every district in B.C. will see us leadin’ the way,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

Chorus (sung with echo and repeated): Rip ’em up, chuck ’em out, F.S.A…

You’ll see them chuck ’em at Moody, at Citadel and Kway,

At Meadowbrook, Stibbs and Seaview, and up at Pinetree Way,

All over the East Zone, and Bramblewood let’s all say,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ F.S.A.


Repeat chorus.

The Tri-City News – AS I SEE IT: FSA tests may be a political football in B.C. but the real game of education is rugby//

// <![CDATA[
document.write(”);// ]]>


AS I SEE IT: FSA tests may be a political football in B.C. but the real game of education is rugby

Published: January 21, 2010 6:00 AM
Updated: January 21, 2010 9:23 AM


// ]]>

AS I SEE IT by Jim Nelson

So the annual hand wringing over the Foundation Skills Assessments tests begins again: Why are teachers so dead against them? Is it just that awful BCTF being radical again? Should we keep our children from writing the tests?

The trouble with the FSA is not the tests but how they are used. FSA exams are the B.C. banner of the accountability movement in education, a movement that has ruined American public schools over the last 20 years and yet is catching on in B.C. despite its disastrous effect on U.S. schools.

The accountability movement started in the U.S. and was borne of the American tendency to analyze, regulate and measure things. A good example of this is the development of American football.

Now, I enjoy an NFL game as much as much as the next person but a look at American football’s metamorphosis from rugby is instructive in understanding the development of the accountability movement in education.

Americans didn’t play rugby for long; rather, they quickly felt the compulsion to regulate and delineate the heck out of it. They divided the field into one-yard segments with 200 hash marks, added five officials, helmets and padding, statistics, instant replay, score clocks and down chains. They broke the game into quarters. Time-outs, huddles, motion rules, penalties — with designated yards for designated offences — are marched off precisely. There are signals for everything, a ritualized kicking game and 300-page playbooks with X’s and 0’s and arrows.

Instead of rugby, with one ball, one referee, an emphasis on spontaneity and creativity, and an almost chivalrous adherence to fair play, our southern cousins ended up with football, a testament to rules, measures, specialization and intervention.

Unfortunately, the same cultural compulsion that spawned American football proved unhelpful when applied to education because education is like rugby. It is interactive, free-flowing, spontaneous and creative, rather than easily quantifiable, pre-packaged and measured. It is too complex to be judged by a standardized measure, no matter how strong the cultural imperative may be to do so.

How can a standardized test measure the “A-ha!” moment when a student suddenly appreciates the brilliance of Shakespeare? How can it measure the ability to co-operate or persevere or to help another student?

Learning takes place through relationships with peers and teachers. It can only be measured somewhat accurately using an aggregation of many and varied assessments, both objective and anecdotal.

We all wish it was simpler, that we could judge how students are doing with a simple urine analysis or a multiple-guess test.

My opinion, although I’m a bit radical, is that an even more accurate indication of how well your child is learning is whether they are happy at school, whether they feel safe, are confident and engaged at school. If they “like” the teacher, have friends, feel good about their studies and enjoy school, they are learning just fine.

The BCTF is dead right on this issue. Although the union brings up red herrings such as how the poor children suffer undue stress when asked to write tests or how the poor teachers have to mark them, or the time it takes out of the curriculum or that the reason they are no good is because of demographic differences, yada yada yada, these are peripheral reasons for objecting to the FSA.

Teachers and the BCTF know viscerally that trying to legitimize standardized measures is harmful to our schools and, thus, our children’s learning. They are the only ones standing against the accountability movement.

As a former school principal in the Tri-Cities, I applaud this stance. Were my children in Grade 7, I would encourage them to not write the FSA exams. Had I a child in Grade 4, I would send him to school and quietly but firmly instruct the school that he is not to write the FSA exams and that perhaps half an hour in the gymnasium or on the playing field might be a good alternative.

Jim Nelson is a retired Tri-City teacher and principal.


Following is “Turfin’ FSA,” which is sung to the tune of the Beach Boys’ “Surfin’ U.S.A.” and was written by Jim Nelson and Dennis Secret:

If everybody had a notion, ’round District 43,

We’d call BS on the testing and we’d go on a spree,

We’ll throw ‘em all in the dumpster, autonomy has its day,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

We’re giving testing the boot,

’Cause it just don’t compute.

And then we’ll set our sights on, the Fraser Institute.

Every district in B.C. will see us leadin’ the way,

Tell the super we’re turfin’, turfin’ FSA

Chorus (sung with echo and repeated): Rip ’em up, chuck ’em out, FSA…

You’ll see them chuck ’em at Moody, at Citadel and Kway,

At Meadowbrook, Stibbs and Seaview, and up at Pinetree Way,

All over the East Zone and even Vanier,

Tell the super we’re turfin’m turfin’ FSA.


Repeat chorus.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bad Optics in School District #43

Along with their colleagues, Coquitlam teachers went on strike for five weeks to make a stand for public education. It cost them each $8000 or so.

School administrators, muzzled for the duration of the strike by district staff, continued to collect their pay. School trustees, superintendents, district staff, and CUPE all collected their pay. Education Ministers got paid as did Premiers. Heck, even parents are getting $40 per day per strike day, per child.

Everyone got paid- except teachers, and the first day they go back to work, Coquitlam stiffs them a day’s pay.

What? Coquitlam? Arguably the most progressive school district in B.C.? You sure you don’t mean Abbottsford, or Chilliwack… or Langley?

No I don’t (although Abbotsford also didn’t pay their teachers – surprise)

Yes, Coquitlam school district didn’t pay its teachers for Friday, September 19th– at least that’s the way it looks to teachers.

The first day after the strike, was the “prep” Friday. Teachers would come into school, prepare classrooms, get class lists, make course changes, and generally wind up June’s untidy finish and get ready for a Monday start. Fair enough says everyone.

But with a bad taste still in their mouths from a long, acrimonious strike, most teachers were in no mood to “volunteer” a day to prepare, even if it meant a messy start on Monday. Many teachers would not have worked Friday had they known they would not get paid.

So they asked if they would be paid for Friday.

“Oh yes, the strike and lockout are over as of Thursday and all teachers will be paid beginning on Friday, Sept. 19th .”

So said the B.C.T.F., B.C.P.S.E.A., and even the government.

But at the end of the month, Coquitlam Teachers, having worked 8 days in September, including Friday September 19th , got paid for 7 days.

Coquitlam teachers were understandably furious, and several of them got a bit insistent at the school board meeting this week, where the unfortunate situation was explained to them.

The explanation goes as follows:

Coquitlam teachers contractually get paid for twenty days each month, because some months have more school days, some fewer. Because it averages out to about 20 days per month, for simplicity’s sake, and by mutual agreement, that’s what teachers get paid each month.

So because teachers were on strike for 13 days in September, they get paid for 7 days rather than the 8 they worked.

The explanation would be laughable if it weren’t so tragic.A school board with a $13 million dollar credibility problem isn’t capable of heading this off at the pass or even fixing it before it hit the fan?

A superintendent of schools can’t phone the union president and have him in to discuss the situation and perhaps agree on how to ameliorate or postpone the pain?

“Bit of a sticky wicket here Charlie, might you drop by the board office for a moment to hash it over?”

It could have been avoided so easily. A postponement, an incremental levy of some kind, or even an up front agreement to take the one day hit in September; anything but to just let it baldly appear on the first pay statement without explanation.

Coquitlam  has a new Secretary Treasurer who has to prove he’s not like the last guy, upon whom has been dumped the blame for the district’s 13 million dollar deficit. I suppose that’s why he didn’t do what any secretary treasurer should do, suggest options to avoid such fiscal catastrophes.

But it’s not just his fault. Did no one realize how awful the optics of this would be; how cruel and disrespectful a statement it made to Coquitlam’s  teachers?

Did anyone consider that this might not be the best way to welcome teachers back to their classrooms?

5 weeks of a grueling strike, convinced most teachers that the provincial government is unrelentingly anti teacher, but most teachers felt secure in the knowledge that the school district was generally supportive and appreciative of their contributions to education in Coquitlam.

So much for that idea.

If you’re not a teacher, it’s hard to comprehend how astoundingly insensitive this move was. It’s an et tu Brute, the unkindest cut of all, and it will take a long time to overcome.

Coquitlam school district has always been rightly proud of the work relationships enjoyed among union groups, teachers, management and trustees over the years.

Coquitlam teachers will be mollified, it will all have been just an unfortunate misunderstanding.Trustees will assure everyone that they love Coquitlam teachers, central office will be diplomatically apologetic – all as comforting as an abusive spouse trying to make amends.

I’m not sure this genie can be put back in the bottle.

But apparently, as Peter Fassbender might cheerfully say,

“The beatings will continue until morale improves.”

Posted in Uncategorized | 33 Comments

School Lists Aren’t What’s Important

TOP OPINION HEADLINE :  PRINCIPAL’S OFFICE: Dear parents, school ‘lists’ aren’t

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Edit
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The First Day of School

The P.N.E. is over. Labour Day weekend is all that stands between summer indolence and the new leaves to be turned over by students beginning on Tuesday, the first day of school.

It’s a time of unease, for students and parents. Will it be a better year?

Will last year’s big worry repeat itself, or be forgotten amidst new successes?

What teacher(s) will she get? I hope it’s not Mr. McGillicuddy – he’s demanding and harsh… but maybe that’s what she needs.

I just want her to be happy at school. How can I best help her return to school successfully?

If I appear confident and reassuring, it will help. I’ll minimize my advice and help her plan her own return to school, from when to get up to what to wear; I’ll allow her to take on the responsibility.

If my only stated expectation is that she enjoys herself (“have fun…”) and if I accept that she’s going to school for herself not for me, it will help.

Latch key situation or not, I will be home when she returns after her first day.

I’ll be sure to be busily distracted by some low-key, calm activity that can be easily interrupted and postponed. I’ll wait for her to initiate the post mortem of her day, rather than pouncing on her for a recounting before she can put down her backpack.

If she comes home happy, I’ll share it with her. I’ll listen and empathize and focus on her happiness, asking clarifying questions; letting her talk rather than giving advice or alluding to my own past school experiences. I’ll act as if her good day is not a surprise; that’s just how good school is and should be. I’ll calmly return to what I was doing, leaving her to bask in her happy day.

If she comes home in tears, with stories of mistreatment by teacher or peers, my first response will be empathy not anger. Feelings aren’t facts, so I’ll listen. I’ll validate her despair without taking a side. It will likely be a disappointment or hurt rather than a major incident – unless I make it one with my response. I’ll ask her what she might do to make it better. I won’t join her anger. I’ll reassure her.

I’ll give her time; and space. I’ll watch and listen. Flurries of text messages or emails mean overt misunderstanding or conflict. If I fan this flame of melodrama, it definitely won’t help her or me.

If there is no peer contact, it likely means someone clumsily or accidentally hurt her feelings.

Either way, I’ll reassure her at every relapse, empathizing, minimizing, distracting if possible.

I’ll matter of factly remove rash solutions; things like, “I’m never going back to that school again!” I’ll avoid expressing outrage with the school, teacher, or peer, knowing that it’s probably a misunderstanding born of nervous anticipation.

If it’s clear that something threatening or inappropriate has happened, I’ll listen and empathize first and then without her knowing, I’ll go to the school; that day, with a view to describing her unhappiness, gathering information and working with the school to help my child solve the problem. I’ll assume the school wants to help. I’ll be calm but resolved, and I won’t criticize students or teachers.

The best possible outcome would be that my child faces and solves the problem herself. The next best outcome is that the problem is resolved without my child knowing that it was fixed for her. The worst and most ominous outcome is that mommy or daddy stomp into the school and forces the school to fix the problem.

But mercifully, none of this will likely happen. First days of school are usually short, great days. For her sake, I’ll try to remain the calm, empathetic, reassuring adult.

I won’t let on that I’m as nervous for her as she is for herself.


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Can Any Government Get Along With B.C. Teachers?

Sure, it’s easy. Local governments  always got along quite well with  teachers. Here’s some strategies local governments used for years that provincial governments might consider employing.

  • Embrace the idea that teachers are professionals, with special and valuable training and skills. Tell teachers and the public this regulary. Preface each discussion and speech about education with this information.
  • Publicly express support for public education. Indicate that public education plays a valuable role in the intellectual and cultural development of our children and is one of the most successful initiatives undertaken by western societies.
  • Say that public education is not an expense but an investment, the best investment we can make in our country’s future.
  • Sugggest that teachers know how to plan, assess, and provide effective learning opportunites and that defending teacher’s professional autonomy is the best thing we can do to improve education. Cite B.C.’s international reputation for education excellence to substantiate this idea.
  • Say that teacher accountability is best when it’s local – accountability to students, parents, colleagues, and Principals – the best judges of effective student learning. Suggest that we should seek to strengthen local accountability, not centralized measurements.

Perhaps throw in a quote to illustrate the point:

           “Everything that can be counted does not necessarily count: everything

             that counts cannot necessarily be counted…”

                                                                                   Albert Einstein

There are other non-monetary strategies available to government to  improve relations with teachers:

  • suggest that educators are best equipped to make education decisions, not people                       from unrelated fields;
  •  suggest that parent involvement in schooling should be predominantly at the local level not at the political level.

None of these strategies costs any money, but provincial  governments have not chosen                    to try them since 1994, when provincial  bargaining was first mandated.

I’m sure provincial governments would be pleasantly surprised  at how easy B.C.’s    teachers are to get along with if they tried some or all of the above strategies.



Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Congratulations Teachers, I Think

The resolution of any collective bargaining conflict is difficult to evaluate until the dust settles, but there are some things we know already. (no pun intended)

Clearly, teachers folded on wages. 7.25% over six years is a ridiculous, six year, annual pay cut, no matter how one slices it –it’s 4% under the estimated cost of living increases over the term of the contract – sorry nurses.

But did teachers get anything in return?

Well, they got E80 turfed. True, E80 was a bit of a throw away for the government, but at least the Supreme Court appeal will go on, although there is reason to be concerned about the “reopener clause” in the tentative agreement.

Teachers got upwards of $3500 per teacher signing bonus, disguised as a 108 million grievance mitigation.That’s new money, but it is a sleight of hand which gives up almost 2 billion in possible grievances from teachers who have been teaching too many kids and too many designated kids since the 2002 contract stripping.

Solving the innumerable grievances arising from the twelve-year period since 2002 is a mind bogglingly messy prospect. But the contract strippers should be the ones responsible for unraveling the nightmare; not the teachers, who had their contracts stripped in the first place. They should not dismiss it cheaply.

Teachers got a few more shekels for class size and composition, an extra 100 million over the term of the contract. That’s new money too though not enough. Four or five more teachers per year hired in Coquitlam? Coquitlam cut ninety plus teachers this year alone. The money can’t possibly address the needs of special needs students. The “fund” in its latest iteration is a cheap out for the government.

Still, that’s $208 million dollars of new money from a government who, for 18 months could out miser Ebeneezer Scrooge. And that doesn’t include some  of  the medical and dental benefit tops ups  won as well as some other benefits to be made more clear as we move forward.

So , given the circumstances, teachers did make gains beyond what they would have got through back to work legislation.

So the government gets to wave  the “affordability zone” circle  at the public and the nurses, while teachers get to sneak $200 plus million out the back door, half for a signing bonus which the government doesn’t have to call a signing bonus, and half to bandaid  class size and composition.

We don’t have all the details of the agreement yet, but while the teachers I have spoken to are relieved, they aren’t as elated as one would think they might be.

They fell a bit cheated – gratified at having hung together, but frustrated that some people, including some hapless Liberal M.L.A.s, have come out from hiding under their bed, to hail the agreement as fair but affordable – it’s neither.

And while some teachers I know feel some ambivalence toward what they know about the tentative settlement, almost all the teachers I know could barely watch Christy Clark’s press conference today.

It was a bit like watching Pontius Pilate hailing a new era of improved relations with Christians.

The irony screamed to teachers. “ A new era in government /teacher relations?”.


If anything came out of this strike, the depth of the government’s determination to punish teachers was top among them. There can be no resurrection of the relationship between this government and teachers without:

  • a public commitment to public education. Not just words, but sustained, substantive action.
  • a willingness to commit money to public education. There hasn’t been a real increase in public education funding since 2002. (small annual per pupil funding increases are immediately gobbled up by M.S.P. download expenses, Hydro increases, carbon offsets, unfunded CUPE salaries , and other fixed costs).
  • At least equal funding increases between private and public schools.
  • A recognition of teachers as professionals and a concomitant catch up salary plan.
  • An indication that educators might make educational decisions, like doctors make medical decisions and lawyers make legal decisions.

And teachers have learned a few things from this strike:

  • They’ve learned the depths of the government’s disdain for public school and teachers.
  • They’ve learned that they often can’t count on the media for much help.
  • They’ve learned they ‘ll never make back the money they lost.
  • They’ve learned that striking is no fun.

But teachers have also made some immeasurable esprit de corps gains out of the dispute.

As a part of his strike post mortem, Vaughan Palmer mused that teachers will think long and hard before striking again. What he didn’t choose to muse is that B.C. governments will, in future, think twice before attacking teachers in such an extended, disrespectful manner.

Thank you teachers, for your steadfast defense of B.C.’s public education system. You have lost lots, but you have gained lots too.

The struggle to defend public education is not over, though this battle is spent.

Although it will be a relief for teachers to be able to sleep again, this ugly, ugly strike will serve to make  the inadequacies in the system more stark to returning teachers.

Resources, staffing, and funding will still be sparse, class size won’t change and class composition will carry on much the same as before. And as schools face another three years of education funding freezes, things will get worse before they’ll get better.

But teachers , through this job action, have focussed public discussion on education and exposed government intransigence and petulance. More important, they have solidified a vision of public education and shared an evangelism they now feel more strongly and unshakeably.

That said, some teachers are considering voting “no” on Thursday, not as a reflection of the work of  B.C.T.F negotiators, but as a statement of protest over what can only be described as a twelve-year vendetta against teachers and public schools.

Ratification of this tentative agreement will happen; should happen. It’s time to stop, get some money in the bank, get back to the kids who need and appreciate you, and live to struggle another day.

The public is done, not willing to hear any more rhetoric about underfunded schools or teachers for a while.

But  maybe 60% ratification might be  better than 95% ratification.

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Public Education is Hurting

" Teaching is so much more than having knowledge to impart.. "

” Teaching is so much more than having knowledge to impart…”

The current B.C. public school dispute is only the latest example, though admittedly the worst, of decades of the undervaluing and underfunding of B.C. public schools and teachers.

Those who aren’t in schools can’t be expected to grasp the level of carnage in our schools over the past twenty years. But instead of listening to hysterical pundits on C.K.N.W. or the Fraser institute, take it from someone who worked in, organized and operated schools for 35 years.

B.C.’s public schools are skeletons of their former selves and we are passing the crisis point.

Were our kids going to school, they would be going to schools that are generally deteriorating, under staffed, under supplied and continuously under siege.

The grass isn’t cut, the weeds aren’t pulled, and summer painting is rare. Renovations, upgrades, and new equipment have long been put on hold, cafeterias are cut back or cut out, textbooks are unaffordable, photocopying is rationed, and teacher’s are falling further behind with each salary cut.

Teaching staffs have shrunk. Counselling, Librarian, and learning centre staffs are too lean to serve kids.

There is a profound lack of supplies, impossible staffing levels, paltry maintenance budgets, skeletal student services, no district curriculum coordinators, few psycho ed testers , no technology geeks. There are fewer Vice Principals, almost none  in elementary schools, from where most were cut long ago.

Money from the government’s “Learning Imrovement Fund” (L.I.F.) is touted as an answer to class size and composition woes but money that trickles through the centralized process to local districts  goes straight into hiring back one or two of the staff laid off after the previous year’s cuts.

And now, education funding is frozen for 2013 –2015. This funding freeze will result in 300 million more in cuts for each of the next three school years.

Schools are already cut to the bone and Principals, teachers, support staff and students have been profoundly affected.

As the load gets heavier, teachers begin to teach defensively, concerned with just making it through the week. When they teach this way, they feel guilty and angry at having to do so.
The more kids and special needs students they have, the more formulaic, the less interactive learning has to become.

Teachers are forced to focus on activities that keep kids busy and compliant. They don’t have the time, resources or class size to offer the kind of engaging learning activities they would prefer to offer. More seat work, worksheets, and tests – multiple choice (easy to mark) Less project learning, group work, individualized instruction, and cooperative learning.

Teachers hate going there, but they are increasingly forced to make adjustments to their teaching and are too often forced to replace engaging and fun with busy and quiet.

Extra curricular activities are leaner, intramurals more rare. There are fewer bands and spring musicals and field trips. The things that make schools meaningful for kids are difficult to sponsor as teaching loads burgeon and disrespect for the profession increases relentlessly.

But the biggest difficulty in public education is that many of us, including our government, no longer consider teaching a profession. Rather they think of it as a job, like working in an office but with better holidays and benefits.

In fact, teaching is a profession, not a job. It requires significant training and regular re-training, sophisticated skills and strategies, and hard work. A good teacher is an incalculably valuable professional. Those who think teaching is cushy  – “ six hours a day, eight months a year, great salary… “, are monumentally mistaken.

Those who think a journeyman cabinetmaker could teach woodwork more effectively than a teacher or that a professional trumpet player could teach band better than can a teacher, are mistaken. Teaching is so much more than having knowledge to impart. As a matter of fact, subject knowledge is one of the least important requirements of being a good teacher. When interviewing for a teaching position, the most important boxes to tick are people skills, not subject proficiency.

Those who attack teaching and teachers by comparing their employment situations to other jobs, invariably ignore the most difficult things teachers deal with in their professional life – that their profession is their life, not a job.

Teachers face thousands of personal interactions and stimuli every day, each crucial to the student, parent, or colleague. They must be “on” at all times, in school, the supermarket, and in the community. Teachers never leave work at work; it’s always on their mind, a constant stream of consciousness and rumination about today and tomorrow’s lessons and that kid who is really hurting.

The first few years of teaching are quite a shock to young teachers. Teaching is so much more difficult than they thought or heard described on Twitter – and they really don’t make much money.

But that’s what teachers signed up for, and after six or seven years, most teachers are at the top of their game, immeasurably more effective than when they began – because there is so much to learn about how to be a good teacher than the surface analyses spouted by internet trolls.

So teachers eagerly accept the challenges of the profession, in exchange for making a difference,  for job security and public respect.

But over the past twenty years, teachers and public schools have seen their profession slowly but inexorably strangled, underfunded and disrespected.

Teachers and public education have had to repeatedly pay the freight for government austerity and budget balancing.

Teachers have lost about 20% of salary to inflation since provincial bargaining was legislated by the Harcourt government in 1994.That NDP government ended the strategy of “whipsawing”; holding up the contracts of other teacher’s groups as immutable settlement templates.

Ironically, whipsawing is the main bargaining strategy now used against teachers, Still, in 1994 ,the government proclaimed whipsawing an unfair labour practice and legislated province wide teacher bargaining. That’s when the enmity between provincial governments and teachers really began.

Provincial governments have many more and different priorities than did local school boards who respected and supported their local teachers. Local governments still respect their firefighters and police and there are few labour disputes with civic workers. Firefighters and police have thrived in bargaining with appreciative local governments.

Conversely, teachers have not done well bargaining provincially, having to compete for funding with other provincial priorities. There are few votes to be gained by putting money into public education and it’s never enough anyway.

Unfortunately there are votes (and campaign money), in increasing funding for private schools.

Private school attendance was at 12% in 2013, up from 4% scant years ago, and government funding for private schools has increased 45% compared with 16% for public schools.

And public schools, principals and teachers have been so repeatedly creative in doing more with fewer resources year after year, that successive provincial governments felt fine about continuing to draw money from the education well to fund other priorities, like tax cuts, infrastructure, and stadia roofs.

In 1973, a beginning teacher made about $5,000 more than a beginning firefighter, policeman, or nurse. Now, firefighters, policemen, and nurses make ten to twenty thousand more than teachers –ten thousand or so more to start, twenty thousand or so more at maximum after a shorter increment scale and less education/training (nurses after 4 yrs. experience- $ 91 thousand, teachers after 11 yrs. and a Masters degree, $78 thousand.)

Disclaimer; firefighters, police, and nurses deserve every penny they make – they perform valuable public services. But firefighters and police  still have the luxury of negotiating contracts with appreciative and respectful local governments, rather than with provincial governments who need to skim money from public services to pay for tax cuts.

And let’s face it, It’s difficult for provincial Education Ministers to feel too warm and fuzzy about teachers because they don’t see them through a local lens – they’re a line item expense not an investment.

Teachers used to be in the middle class. Now they’re in the working class. Yet surprisingly, teachers are so easily bullied they don’t even seem to mind the relegation. But they do mind not having the resources to do their jobs well. That’s why teachers are feeling angry and beaten up.

Teachers choose the profession out of passion. They willingly trade any chance of getting rich for a worthwhile, secure profession, a chance to contribute something meaningful to people and the community.

But now, few chemistry whizzes, computer aces, or shrewd mathematicians are going into education anymore –why would they?

Teacher surpluses have been institutionalized by relentless education cuts and a continuing University cash grab, and many prospective teachers have shoulder shrugged into what is fast becoming a job not a profession..

Public education is a complex activity – too complex to be dismissed with inapt comparisons with what other workers do, earn, or deserve.This is not to say that other occupations are not complex, there are just too many variables and priorities to compare.

Tenure and benefits haven’t been taken away yet, but teachers and public schools have been the silent whipping boys of austerity minded governments in every other way for many years.

The current education dispute is about the chronic underfunding of public education over the past twenty years. It’s about salary too, but more than that it’s about respectful treatment, something public schools and educators have not felt from provincial governments for too long.

Public education is the most successful collective initiative of western democracies. Canadian public schools are the melting pot of our multicultural mosaic.

Our public schools are hurting, and we’re not only not defending them, many of us are throwing gas on the fire.

If the B.C. public isn’t willing to take a macro look at whether we want a properly funded, vibrant public education system, we’ll keep degrading public schools and teachers as we march down the American road toward destroying a world class public school system.

Posted in Uncategorized | 39 Comments

New Rule #6 in B.C.’s Education Dispute

New rule;

Everyone must stop saying;

“ I want teachers to get a fair salary increase… as long as it’s affordable…”

Because that’s not what they mean.

Those who make this statement urging teachers to accept affordable salary increases, actually favour salary decreases for teachers.

Beyond their statement are some simple, stark numbers:

Cost of living increase in B.C.(Bank of Canada)   2002 -2014           25.07%.

B.C. teacher salary increases                                         2002 -2014           19.50%

Since 2002, B.C. teacher’s salaries have decreased signficantly to inflation.

And in the future?

Projected Consumer Price Index Rise                 2014 -2019               11.08 %

Gov’t salary offer to teachers                                    2014- 2019                 7.00 %

Teacher’s salary demands                                           2014-2018                 8.00 %


Clearly, not only is the government’s salary offer less than the projected cost of living increase over the contract’s term, so are the teacher’s salary demands.

Bizarrely, B.C. teachers are embroiled in a costly strike, part of which includes their fight to achieve five or six more years of cuts to their salaries.

So those who say;

“ I want teachers to get a fair salary increase. but it’s got to be affordable to taxpayers“ , must stop it immediately and in future say what they actually mean;

“ A 3.08 % salary cut over five years is too much for teachers.Instead, I think B.C.’s teachers should accept a more affordable,  4.08% salary  cut over six years.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Machine Gears Up

 Just as B.C.s teachers were beginning to wonder if the bombing had stopped and they could peek out of their foxholes in search of reasoned détente, B.C.s right wing machine has unleashed its fury on Public Education and B.C.s teachers.

Yes, the same machine that for thirty years has crucified N.D.P governments with withering carpet-bombing has turned its guns on public education and teachers.

The Vancouver Sun publishes a six-page section lauding private schools. It looks like an advertising flyer, complete with testimonials and Fraser Institute data about the wonder of the private school experience.

C.K.N.W. kicks in daily on its talk shows, interviewing teachers who don’t support the B.C.T.F and people who insist that B.C. spends $500 more per student than other provinces on education, even though they know it not to be true.

Online anti education trolls, recently dormant, are re invigorated by the suddenly incendiary rhetoric of high profile anti teacher Tweeters.

The machine fills the air with vitriol. It’s inescapable.

Gone are any reasoned analyses. Gone is any broad view of the success and importance of public education or the professionalism of teachers.

A media that only reluctantly reported on disgraceful government bargaining behaviour had lazily regressed into a tedious ‘pox on both their houses” stance.

But that’s all over now. The machine calls, and predictably, they answer.The enemy is on its knees, time to move in and finish him off.

And as their prey lies wounded in the smoke, they compete to be the one seen to have delivered the coup de grace.

We’ve seen it so often in this province. Never underestimate the power of the right wing media machine in B.C.

But this time, the machine isn’t just helping to destroy  politicians, it’s facilitating the destruction of a school system.

Posted in New Rules in B.C. Education Dispute | 14 Comments

Where’s the Money Supposed to Come From? How about from A.T.M. Machines?

Could A.T.M.s Fund Public Services?

At the same time we complain about the cost of funding public services, Canadians happily give banks hundreds of millions in A.T.M. fees each year.

It costs banks about $.36 per transaction to maintain automatic teller machines.

Most banks charge between $2.00 and $4.00 per A.T.M. transaction.

That’s anywhere from $1.69 to  $3.64 per A.T.M. transaction that Canadians give to an industry that makes 19 billion dollars in profit per year.

Might there not be a better use for A.T.M. fee proceeds?

What if we set all A.T.M. fees at $2.00, gave the bank $ 1.00 and assigned $1.00 to fund public services? (Education, health or transit) That’s $420 million per year to start, more if we raised A.T.M. fees or lowered the bank’s cut.

I know, your bank and B.C. credit union A.T.M.s charge nothing, and yes, there are jurisdictional concerns – the federal government is in charge of banks.

And I know, banks would offer fewer A.T.M.s. After all, under this scheme, they would only net $.64 per transaction.

But beyond nit picking the numbers and logistics, the proceeds from A.T.M. fees are only one glaring example of money we willingly give away to private business that could be used to fund necessary public services.

Of course this plan won’t happen – we’d never be willing to wrestle a nickel from any wealthy entity, let alone a bank, just to support public spending.

Still, it’s undeniable and disturbing that we will simultaneously open our wallets to donate money to banks, and our mouths to scream about the funding of public services.

Posted in New Rules in B.C. Education Dispute, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Google it – it’s Unanimous

Finland has the world’s best education system; has had for ten or fifteen years.

Finnish students clean up on international measures, and not just a few brainy lutefisk eaters.

Almost all Finnish students do well on international PISA measures in Science, Math, and Reading.

Given that B.C. is in the middle of a wrestling match over public education, what can we learn from Finland’s top ranked schools that might help our government in their struggle with B.C.’s teachers?

Is Finland cutting education funding each year?

Are the Finns increasing funding for private schools?

Is Finland fighting with their teachers?

Is Finland increasing rigour and competition, touting standardized testing, merit pay, and accountability measures?

Is Finland moving away from local professional autonomy and towards centralized accountability?

How about governance of schools? Is Finland moving towards a system where government, who may have little knowledge or training in education make the decisions about their school system?

The world’s best education system does none of the above. They do precisely the opposite.

What Finland can teach us, is what they have proven works in schools.

For twenty years, Finnish education has stressed:

  • Equality of opportunity for all children (no public funding of private schools)
  • Expecting and trusting teachers and schools to design, deliver, and assess student-learning.
  • Early identification of learning difficulties and “whatever it takes” intervention with special needs students.
  • Unanimous societal respect for teachers
  • No standardized or high stakes testing.
  • Highly trained teachers, with Masters degrees.
  • Education system overseen by trained educators.
  • More art, music, P.E.- less classroom time and homework
  • Less competition, more collaboration

In short, just about every direction in which our B.C. government wants to take public education is exactly opposite to what has been proven to work in the world’s best schools.

Do yourself a favour. Google “What’s so good about Finnish education?”

If one does any research in the area of public education, the behaviour of our provincial government in dealing with teachers and schools is completely discordant with what works in schools and what we should be doing in publlc education.

Posted in New Rules in B.C. Education Dispute | 1 Comment

John Baird – Darling of U.S. Shock Talker

NELSON: Consider source of such praise – The Tri-City News.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Teachers Whipsawed


It’s ironic that in this year’s education dispute, B.C. teachers have been pummeled by a bargaining strategy they were vilified for using in the 80s and 90s.

It’s called “whipsawing”.

“Whipsawing” is when one negotiating unit puts their bargaining opponent in a difficult position by pointing to the contract settlements of similar bargaining groups and demanding a similar settlement.

Sound familiar?

It should, because that’s the strategy being used by the provincial government this year in bargaining with teachers.

By pointing to the salary settlements of other B.C. Public sector unions, the government can feign reluctant intransigence; they couldn’t possibly offer teachers more than “everyone else” happily accepted.

They speak of an “affordability zone “ as if it’s an immutable law of economics and cite “me too” clauses in other union contracts as reasons for intransigent bargaining.

Ending whipsawing was the very rational government used to legislate teachers into provincial bargaining in 1994.

Until 1994, B.C.’s teachers bargained with their local school boards. Once a small district like Cranbook or Fernie had settled, the rest of B.C.’s teachers would point to the settlements and leverage (and get) similar settlements.

And local bargaining worked well, for teachers, parents and the school system. Schools were well funded and teachers actually negotiated some reasonable contracts. There were some small, short, work stoppages, but they were local, and contracts were settled through negotiation every year.

When teachers bargained locally, civic governments could respond nimbly to local education needs. Schools and teachers were valued and schools well funded.

The remnants of that equitable, well-funded education system established during the days of local bargaining is what is now being internationally lauded as one of the best education systems in the world.

And that’s the system we have been systematically gutting.

In 1994, the N.D.P government had had enough of local bargaining. They said they needed to put an end to years of contract whipsawing by teachers.

Whipsawing was deemed an unfair and unaffordable strategy, one that should never be used again.

This year, B.C. public sector unions with differing priorities and histories didn’t argue much about taking a 1% per year increase (a 5-year salary cut)

Why? Because it’s a fair salary package? No, there are no circumstances that could make what amounts to a five-year annual wage cut “fair”.

But provincial public sector unions have witnessed a government willing to play dirty, one that has demonstrated little respect for the public sector or their contracts.

They have seen privatization of H.E.U. contracts, capricious contracting out, increased workloads, staff cuts and even wholesale contract stripping.

The public sector unions that have, according to the government, all happily accepted five-year salary cuts, accepted them because they had one bargaining priority; protecting their jobs.

So union after union accepted unacceptable salary packages in exchange for job security language and assurances.

That’s how the government is whipsawing public education and public school teachers.

Now that teachers and public education have to compete for funding with corporate tax breaks, stadium roofs, MLA raises, and paying legal bills for those involved in government scandals, our public schools are being continuously starved of funding.

We will soon see the end of the international accolades for B.C. public education, as the twelve years of cutting public school budgets works through the system; and all because teacher bargaining has come full circle.

Whipsawing was deplorable when teachers used the strategy but it seems it’s fair game now that the government finds it effective in their fight against B.C.’s teachers.

Posted in New Rules in B.C. Education Dispute | 2 Comments

Free From Society’s Riff Raff

 An Old American Spiritual

In North America and certainly in B.C., sane analysis of public education has long been abandoned; replaced with vitriolic anecdotal attacks on public schools and teachers.

We direct most of our unrelenting ire at “the teacher’s union”. The teacher’s union is a scapegoat safely removed from our neighbourhoods. It’s more palatable to hate the union than to rant against the local school or our child’s teacher, good old Mrs. McGillicuddy (who really works hard, unlike those union types).

Public school bashing is not new. It’s an old southern folk song, the lyrics of which Canadians, and especially British Columbians, are just now learning to sing with gusto. (because we have such a perky anti education choir leader).

The old, anti –education U.S. spiritual that helped Americans through the difficult days of destroying their public education system has become a conservative anthem in Canada; with B.C. supplying the most inspiring voices.

B.C Public Schools Doing Well Despite It All

Why do we sing such an anti public education song? Surely our public schools must be abject failures in order to engender such public hostility? In fact, no; international measures continue to rank Canada’s public schools among the best in the world and B.C.’s public schools the best in Canada.

But rather than laud these statistics to vindicate and support public schools, we use them to excuse cutting funding, depressing salaries, increasing funding to private schools, and even for unconstitutional and petulant government behaviour.

We’re All Education Experts

So why do we attack one of the best public education systems in the worlds? One reason is because we’re all experts on education. We’ve all been to school. We all had a Mr. Switz who was bossy and lazy. We all have a foggy residue of personal rebellion (those teachers think they’re so smart).

Many of our anti education impressions come from memories of young brains that didn’t know that there were so many kids with challenges in our class – I could read – surely everyone else in my class could too? What’s all the fuss about? There were forty in my class and it didn’t affect me.

Anti- Education Anecdotes

We also attack public education because of the flood of over simplified anecdotal outrages we are fed.

5 year old boy suspended for hugging a girl…”

They don’t include the rest of the story, that the lad’s serial hugging was unwanted, repeatedly complained about and that his parents were combative when asked how they could work together to help Johnny curtail his unwelcomed hugging.

Media all over the U.S. and Canada instead chose to use this story as an example of public school malpractice.

“ Shouldn’t public schools encourage love, not squelch it by wielding institutional power over a five year old? ”

This, and other incomplete anecdotes, appeal to long  latent school angst lurking in all of us.

 Our Child’s Experience

Our attitudes towards public schools are also formed by our children’s experience, the struggles they face, the worries we face as parents – these stresses we often project on schools in our state of worry. So for some understandable reasons, we are pre-disposed to criticize public schools. When governments attack public education or teachers, we often join in the chorus or we’re slow to defense.

Dismantling Public Schools

It’s important to realize that our unwillingness to defend public schools is doing more than just giving voice to our individual experiential biases towards education; it’s endangering the future of the public school system.

Because attacking public education isn’t just a random act of austerity. It’s not an attempt to put teachers in their place. It’s not about saving taxpayer money or fighting waste, or defending struggling private sector workers.

The anti public school campaign is about dismantling public schools, or more correctly, relegating public schools to the task of educating society’s riff raff – you know, the ones I don’t want my Mary to associate with.

Privatizing education plays a  part of institutionalizing the income inequity that conservatives have attained over the last twenty years. Privatizing education emasculates middle and working classes and helps reinforce a class system. It’s the coup de grace to  hopes of regaining our lost social egalitarianism and economic mobility.

Dismantling public education will remove the last cultural and economic field leveler our country has. Unions are on the ropes, now if we can just get rid of public schools…

Now I know it would be a stretch to accuse our own, provincial politicians of such a sophisticated conspiracy, but encouraging a two, or even three tiered education system underpins the neo conservative vision.

Private Schools Pushed

In B.C., private school funding has increased at three times the rate of public school funding since 2005. As a result, private school attendance has reached 12% of B.C. students. The Kool-Aid is being drunk. Public schools in the U.S are foundering, according to all international measures. Serial underfunding of public schools, championing school choice, voucher systems, Charter Schools – anything that will allow my child to avoid the riff raff of society and keep those minorities in their place.(somewhere else)

It May Be too Late

Personally, I think it may be too late for B.C.’s public schools. The only way to save our public schools is too stop publicly funding their alternative, and that’s not imminent . Our current premier’s attitude toward increasing public education funding is a Charlton Heston-like “from my cold, dead hand…”

In addition, our Premier’s child goes to private school, as do (incomprehensively) the children of some public school educators. So we’re stuck with a two-tier school system.

Having learned nothing from the American destruction of public schools, we’ll likely continue to mercilessly slag a world class public system, helped and encouraged by a media not much disposed to real analysis.

Like educational lemmings we’ll follow the American school system over the educational cliff, vilifying public educators as we go, chanting;

“Free from riff raff, free from riff raff, thank God Almighty, we’re free from riff raff. ”

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Hamburg’s Weekly Magazine “Der Spiegel” Rips Donald Trump

Here’s the pertinent bits of Der Spiegel’s Trump indictment,which is both bacterial and viral!


“The U.S. elected a laughing stock to the presidency and has now made itself dependent on a joke of a man. The country is, as David Brooks wrote recently in the New York Times, dependent on a child. The Trump administration has no foreign policy because Trump has consistently promised American withdrawal while invoking America’s strength. He has promised both no wars and more wars. He makes decisions according to his mood, with no strategic coherence or tactical logic. Moscow and Beijing are laughing at America. Elsewhere, people are worried.

“Donald Trump is not fit to be president of the United States. He does not possess the requisite intellect and does not understand the significance of the office he holds nor the tasks associated with it. He doesn’t read. He doesn’t bother to peruse important files and intelligence reports and knows little about the issues that he has identified as his priorities. His decisions are capricious and they are delivered in the form of tyrannical decrees.

“He is a man free of morals. As has been demonstrated hundreds of times, he is a liar, a racist and a cheat. I feel ashamed to use these words, as sharp and loud as they are. But if they apply to anyone, they apply to Trump. And one of the media’s tasks is to continue telling things as they are: Trump has to be removed from the White House. Quickly. He is a danger to the world.

“The first is Trump’s resignation, which won’t happen. The second is that Republicans in the House and Senate support impeachment, which would be justified by the president’s proven obstruction of justice, but won’t happen because of the Republicans’ thirst for power, which they won’t willingly give up. The third possible solution is the invocation of the 25th Amendment, which would require the cabinet to declare Trump unfit to discharge the powers of the presidency. That isn’t particularly likely either. Fourth: The Democrats get ready to fight and win back majorities in the House and Senate in midterm elections, which are 18 months away, before they then pursue option two, impeachment.”

“Fifth: the international community wakes up and finds a way to circumvent the White House and free itself of its dependence on the U.S. Unlike the preceding four options, the fifth doesn’t directly solve the Trump problem, but it is nevertheless necessary – and possible.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

It Wasn’t John Horgan’s Fault – Don’t Even Think About It…


Socreds win again. Four more foreflushing years focsussed on the health of business not people, crony capitalists rather than public service, of lies and scandals, punishing public schools and teachers. Worst of all it ‘s all buoyed by a complicit corporate media.

But after this tragic loss, let’s not waste our post mortem time tut tutting about the leader or the campaign strategy. Neither John Horgan nor the NDP strategy lost this election.

“Horgan should have done this… the campaign should have done that.”
No. This election , as in most provincial elections, the NDP was doomed from the start by B.C.’s corporate media (especially Postmedia) strategy.

They started slowly with stories of an early big NDP lead due to voter anger with myriad Socred scandals. They described a few of the dozens of scandals and set in the minds of BC voters that this time, it looked like the NDP’s election to lose.
By doing this early groundwork, the media did two things:

First they set high expectations for an NDP win. Over the subsequent weeks, it allowed them to cherry pick polls and chronicle a Socred “comeback”, a comeback they could attribute to prudent Socred fiscal mangement. It also gave them lots of time to change the other side of the narrative by discussing the tax and spend proclivities of the NDP in the horrific 90s, a false narrative that is no longer even questioned it’s been sold for so long. Coupled with coverage of a surprising “surge” of Green Support on the Island, where Socreds can only win seats with a split vote, the media campaign to re-elect the Socreds was well on it’s way.

Second, and more important, giving the NDP a big early lead in the “polls” got voter anger out there early so it was easier to diffuse later on, and most importantly, it could fizzle out early with the indifferent voter, who really doesn’t “follow politics much.”

Having chronicled the “comeback” with a series of cherry picked polls , the 2017 election media campaign culminated with an almost surgical final week of manipulation of the undecided voter.

The Globe and Mail started it off, with a glowing endorsement of Socred fiscal mangement – “5 balanced budgets!”. They threw in an embarrassingly fawning column by Gary Mason who sung Christy Clark’s praises.

The Sun was on board all along, with headlines like “Horgan, a leader looking for a backbone”. They finished it up Saturday with an outright Socred endorsement without mentioning scandals, fudge it budgets, poverty levels, or BC Hydro bankruptcy.

CKNW, always a reliable Socred player, interviewed Keith Baldrey in a nauseating segment on Saturday , Mr Baldrey feigning political objectivity. Giving the impression that he had sifted through all the information which yielded the inescapable conclusion that Socreds were the prudent vote.

The Province did one better on Sunday, placing, just below the paper’s gleeful Socred endorsement , a letter to the editor that they headlined “NDP Will Bankrupt Us ”.
It’s quite simple. About 40% of British Columbian voters favour the NDP. About 35% favour the Socreds, 12 -20% are “undecided” or indifferent.

It is this group of voters who decide every BC election.

If they walk into the voting booth having most recently heard anger and disgust with Socred scandal and mismanagement , the NDP wins.

But if, like this election, the last thing they heard was the orchestrated testimonials of the media and the amazing comeback of a gifted campaigner, the NDP gets beat.

The latter is usually the scenario, and it was the scenario this time.

A carefully coordinated comeback, a push of the Green party, a last minute characterization of the stuck NDP bus as analogous to the failed NDP campaign and it’s all over.

But this time,let’s please not blame the candidate. Let’s instead blame the real villain(s) –  a coordinated, corporate media campaign which never laid a glove on the most odious government B.C. has ever had.


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments